I knew you were a former Keyes operative but are you actually “the chairman of a third party supporting Alan Keyes”?
You have to admit that kills any objectivity for anything you present here. At least you’re honest in who you still support, although Keyes will never be President. With a conservative like Sarah at the head of the ticket, he wouldn’t even be able to garner enough disaffected conservatives to be a spoiler.
algernonpj is a Keyes fanboy, too.
There’s nothing wrong with my objectivity. As always, my opposition to Palin is quite objective, and based on solid conservative grounds.
1. I don’t support politicians who are pro-choice for states on abortion, any more than an abolitionist would have supported Stephen A. Douglas in the 1850s.
2. I don’t support politicians who are judicial supremacists, and especially candidates for executive office who refuse to recognize their sworn duties when it comes to reining in out of control judges and providing the absolutely crucial checks and balances our founders intended.
3. I don’t support politicians who support a “pathway to citizenship” for those who have illegally invaded my country.
4. I don’t support politicians who want to hand off taxing authority and control over the world’s resources to the tyrants at the UN.
Other than a few wry comments and jokes on this thread concerning its ridiculous nature I’ve pretty much confined my criticism of Sarah Palin to those very important matters. For me, any one of them all by itself would be a deal killer for any candidate. And none of it has a single thing to do with Alan Keyes, as much as my detractors here would like it to be so.