[dforest]

So she was for it before she was against it?

I got it.

[FreeReign]

The data was found to be faked after 2007. Like millions of Americans, she switch her position after that.

So she was for it before she was against it? I got it.

No, I don't think that you do.

I gave you a possible detailed and logical explanation of why, like millions of Americans, she changed her mind after finding out that the data was faked.

You replied with a slogan often applied to politicians who vote for and then against the same legislation.

[SoConPubbie]

So she was for it before she was against it?

I got it.

So, she finds out the data has been fudged and changes her position on the issue and all you have to say is some JackAss statement like that?

What are you, 14?