Posted on 11/27/2010 12:56:43 PM PST by factmart
Coming from a concern troll, that’s quite a complement.
Indeed.
I couldn’t care less how it looks to you.
Believing anything written at Pollutico can put you in a patch of strange smelling mud...
.
Ronald Reagan was adamantly opposed to the LOST because he recognized it clearly as one more of the seemingly endless series of incremental assaults on our national sovereignty. He held the line against it, but as soon as he left office the globalist elites (including the GHWBush, Clinton, and GWBush administrations) ramped up their efforts to revive it.
The GWBush folks claimed they “fixed” the problems Reagan was concerned about, and I’m not certain of the dates but I believe John Bolton’s early testimony in favor of it was during the time he was being considered as UN Ambassador. Regardless, that testimony was based on the Bush administration’s official policy regarding LOST.
In addition, despite his many excellent qualities, Freepers need to understand that Bolton is one of the establishment/globalist elite. He just happens to be in the faction that doesn’t hate this country and want to see it humbled and/or destroyed. Too many here confuse style with substance when it comes to evaluating public figures.
Reagan was right about LOST. No matter how reasonable it may sound, or whatever safeguards to our sovereignty its proponents may claim, it’s a Trojan horse.
For example, those tribunals which it is claimed we need to have a voice in are just like the WTO (World Trade Organization) tribunals we were assured would treat us fairly in trade disputes. Their record shows, however, we have been almost universally screwed in their rulings, just as almost all United Nations votes go against us. The “international community” hates us, and all of these “multilateral” organizations and agreements are designed to disadvantage us and give advantage to our opponents.
It’s not a Question if Palin is on our side, but are we we on her side?
If not on her side you are on the side that’s hates freedom!
> “A little more research and you’ll find out I like German Shepherds.”
.
Beastiality is not too popular here...
.
> “If the nominee is Gingrich or Huckabee, I am going to bed and pulling the covers over my head.”
.
LOL! - As good as any solution to that pair :o)
We also know she has the same love of freedom as Reagan!
All these puppies who come up with reasons not to support Palin are afraid of a fight to have the our best!
In all my years I have never seen so many people try to stop the front runner from running!
I wish everyone would get in the race tomorrow and let the best woman win!
She has been vetted by the media for 2 and half years
No ONE IN HISTORY HAS BEEN VETTED MORE
Remember how they loved McCain until he became the nominee or course hey didn't half to hate as much because he didn't have a chance.
Palin IS THE BEST WE HAVE IF WE WANT A CONSERVATIVE!
I’m tired of people who are not backing the Palin as President when she is as conservative as Reagan, but they will end of telling us Palin supporters later, you will have to support the Rino if she doesn’t make it, like they told us in 2008!
Real men will vote for Palin because they knows she has more balls then 99% of the men they know, either way the majority of men will vote Republican. Men have not voted for a Democrat for President 70 years.
Because of Sarah Palin the Woman voted Republican in the midterms November 2nd, 2010 for the First time every!
The only men who will vote for Zero are THOSE FOR GAY MARRIGE, and those men jealous of Sarah Palin’s BALLS!
Wisconsin Which was so in love with Zero, now hates him. Cannot find any sane person admit they voted for him,
Wisconsin goes Palin in 2012!
Wisconsin Which was so in love with Zero, now hates him. Cannot find any sane person admit they voted for him,
Wisconsin goes Palin in 2012!
This is the TRUTH, that the puppies that says she is too hated don’t realize, They will all be 3 years behind Palin in knowing how to fight, THE SAID ALL THE SAME THINGS ABOUT REAGAN TOO! BUT REAGAN IS NO PALIN, SHE HAS A NORMAL FAMILY!
There was not one candidate in 2008 > That’s the problem, in 2000 everyone got behind Bush early, Bush was Palin back then, everyone was for Bush unless you were a Rino! If we all got behind Palin now, WE would not get a RINO!
If she was not a women, she would be backed like Bush was!
She will be a much better President then Bush.
In the history of America no politician has been told not to run ever by the people who will only vote Democrat anyhow. Whats wrong with this picture?
Run Sarah run!
Hillary Clinton can’t beat Sarah Palin in 2012, because the blacks will stay home and if the dems lose even 3 or 4 per cent of the black vote, their goose is cooked!
I can’t believe people even think Hillary would run just to lose?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.