[KTM rider]

it would be far simpler to just adhere to the constitution as it was originally intended

the entire problem is the perverse stretch of the Interstate Commerce Clause ( the pandoras box of socialism )

[Monorprise]

“it would be far simpler to just adhere to the constitution as it was originally intended

the entire problem is the perverse stretch of the Interstate Commerce Clause ( the pandoras box of socialism )”

Simple only as the enforcement of any law is depended upon enforcers of the law being among the victims rather then the criminals who would break that law.

In the case of a Constitutional law who’s chief object of restriction is the government it authorizes the Government in question is the only possible criminal, while the victim is the people and, in the case of the Federal Government, their States as well.

Therefore logically speaking the enforcers of the Constitution must be the same party’s named in 1798 by the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions. This is the key “flaw” that has been sense the “Civil War” incorporated by presumption of the Federal government itself into our system.

It is this presumption that must be abolished, or there can be no amendment to no constitution which will ever permitted truly constitutionally limited government.