Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeattleBruce; 4Liberty; misterrob; EternalVigilance; Oceander; Starboard; Sherman Logan; ...
There is simply no way to remove humans completely from the equation.

This is the problem. And when the humans are politicians, or influenced or controlled by politicians, it's even worse. I proposed letting private entities, banks, commodity depositories, or anyone issue their own currencies and, even though each one might take years, or even decades, to develop enough of a reputation, if they really managed the currency carefully enough to develop a following, such currencies would have the tightest controls of all -- verrry hard-earned reputations and competition. Just musing. Wuddya think?

132 posted on 11/27/2010 8:22:34 PM PST by FreeKeys (DON'T vote "D". It now stands for DICTATORSHIP.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: FreeKeys

Private currency has been done in the US before, although it was more like a license than the actually ability to print money. The problem is that the all-important reputation is diluted as you move spatially away from the issuing bank. While this is less of a problem these days than say even 20 years ago, multiple currencies always injects a higher level of uncertainty into a transaction, especially if that transaction may span long periods of time (e.g., a 30-year mortgage). Personally, I’d be real nervous about giving a private entity the right to issue their own currencies.


140 posted on 11/29/2010 6:20:51 AM PST by econjack (Some people are as dumb as soup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson