Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

North Korea Will Never Play Nice (Good Analysis)
NYT ^ | 11/24/2010 | B.R. Myers

Posted on 11/25/2010 9:38:13 AM PST by mojito

WHILE it is cowardly and foolish not to resist an act of aggression, the best way to deal with a provocation is to ignore it — or so we are taught. By refusing to be provoked, one frustrates and therefore “beats” the provoker; generations of bullied children have been consoled with this logic. And so it is that the South Korean and American governments usually refer to North Korea’s acts of aggression as “provocations.”

The North’s artillery attack on a populated South Korean island is now getting the same treatment, with the South’s president, Lee Myung-bak, vowing that Pyongyang will be “held responsible” and that “additional provocative acts” will be punished “several times over.”

There is no reason that North Korea’s dictator, Kim Jong-il, should take those words seriously. Mr. Lee made similar noises in March, when the North was accused of killing 46 South Korean sailors by torpedoing a naval vessel, the Cheonan, and what was the result? A pacifist South Korean electorate punished Mr. Lee’s party in regional elections, and the attack faded from the headlines.

The North’s attack on Yeonpyeong Island has been more shocking to South Koreans, but not much more. At my local train station the morning after the attack, a grinning crowd watched coverage of the Asian Games in China on a giant TV screen. The same ethno-nationalism that makes South Koreans such avid followers of international sports also dilutes their indignation at their Northern brethren. South Korea’s left-wing press, which tends to shape young opinion, is describing the shelling of the island as the inevitable product of “misunderstandings” resulting from a lack of dialogue.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: northkorea; southkorea
The author recently published a short but excellent book on North Korea, "The Cleanest Race," which I can heartily recommend.
1 posted on 11/25/2010 9:38:19 AM PST by mojito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mojito
They are testing President Fail.

Kim will whip out his rolled up newspaper and Obummer will wet himself and do what he's told.

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

2 posted on 11/25/2010 9:45:45 AM PST by Bon mots ("Anything you say, can and will be construed as racist...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mojito

The story says that the South Korean population is showing little concern over the attack. I agree with the author. They should be very concerned but if they don’t care why should we?


3 posted on 11/25/2010 9:49:14 AM PST by BiggieLittle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BiggieLittle

Once again, I say bring it on.


4 posted on 11/25/2010 9:53:00 AM PST by postoak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BiggieLittle
The story says that the South Korean population is showing little concern over the attack. I agree with the author. They should be very concerned but if they don’t care why should we?

Not only are they not concerned, large swaths of the South Korean population blames the United States for every aggressive action the North takes.

It is amazing, but true. South Koreans appear to be very fat and happy, and like Europeans, are fully prepared to get hit now and again without responding so long as nothing interrupts their cushy lifestyles.

To be fair, largely ignoring the North is probably the best policy - most importantly, cutting them off from all food and fuel aid, but the South should not outright shrug off military attacks against them like this at it just invites more of the same.

5 posted on 11/25/2010 9:54:46 AM PST by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mojito

You cannot reason with North Korea.


6 posted on 11/25/2010 9:56:08 AM PST by Ptarmigan (God Hates Bunnies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mojito
i wouldn't call killing citizens a provocation. it's an act of war and a gov’t that has the responsibility to defend it's borders and citizens is remiss if they don't take action to prevent it from happening again and again.
7 posted on 11/25/2010 9:56:18 AM PST by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paul51

True, but WE ingnore the fact that Mexico has invaded us with AT LEAST 600 US army-sized DIVISIONS, if you count each of the sneak-ins as a soldier. 600 divisions is a FAR larger army than any nation has ever fielded, much less INVADED with!


8 posted on 11/25/2010 10:09:15 AM PST by 2harddrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

I agree with you. They’re crazy to shrug off being shelled but if they shrug it off we should shrug it off. The nuclear weapon issue is another story.


9 posted on 11/25/2010 10:19:43 AM PST by BiggieLittle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mojito

I’m worried that Jong-Un is far more ambitious and rogue than his predecessors and will be far more dangerous.


10 posted on 11/25/2010 10:20:54 AM PST by Free Vulcan (The battle isn't over. Hold their feet to the fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paul51

If you don’t defend your borders you deserve everything you get. That goes for SK and the US. That’s the prime job of any government not providing Viagra to senior citizens.


11 posted on 11/25/2010 10:22:35 AM PST by BiggieLittle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mojito

Once we get a President with some balls, we should execute a decapitation of the leadership on NK and give the Chinese a nice refugee problem.


12 posted on 11/25/2010 10:38:31 AM PST by thethirddegree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969
If I was president. With our presence and their own they have little to be concerned about as far as a major attack.

I would go one step farther. if the South Koreans don't care we should just pack up and leave.

13 posted on 11/25/2010 11:30:46 AM PST by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric cartman voice* 'I love you guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mojito

Why do we assume that China is in disagreement with North Korea?

China has traditionally encouraged infighting between its neighbors. As far as China is concerned, a NK with nukes causing trouble for SK and the USA is good. We waste resources and energy trying to fix a problem we are unwilling to fix right.


14 posted on 11/25/2010 12:12:07 PM PST by MontaniSemperLiberi (Moutaineers are Always Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan

His youth (26) certainly suggests that he may be inclined to act very rashly.


15 posted on 11/25/2010 8:48:28 PM PST by squidly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson