[AndyJackson]

And once again, I think you should read your own case cites such as in United States v. Biswell, 406 U.S. 311 (1972) where the court held, regarding the regular inspection of licensed gun dealers:

We have little difficulty in concluding that, where, as here, regulatory inspections further urgent federal interest, and the possibilities of abuse and the threat to privacy are not of impressive dimensions, the inspection may proceed without a warrant where specifically authorized by statute

In the particular case of fingering women and girls and groping men, the "abuse and threat to privacy" is of impressive dimensions, of a degree that offends many if not most sensible citizens.

And yes I am mad, I am determined to exposed patent silly frauds like you who try to stand on their credentials and sling around BS rather than stand on the force of well-reasoned argument like most well-credentialed professionals do.

[freedomwarrior998]

Do you understand that Biswell just destroyed your earlier contention? Now you are trying to flip the script? LOL!

OK, let's see how well you can read.

Read the next case, slowly, and try to comprehend it, as it deals DIRECTLY with airport screenings:

United States v. Aukai, 497 F.3d 955 (2007).