Repealing DADT isn’t the issue. The issue is going to be what happens when we are faced with having to promote officers based on sexual orientation and not ability.
Good for Fox. I’ll bet poor Shep is crying himself to sleep at night.
Listening to the homo-perverts, you learn that they don’t even want a reasoned implementation - they want it gone without preparation. So now, an open sodomite rooming with a normal serviceman isn’t going to cause some disruption, especially if he’s as militantly homo as many of these activists are? Please!
Oh yes, let’s just keep playing with the Military based upon what other countries tell us we should do.
Women have called for and gotten a new Combat Uniform to suit their shape, one saying of the current ACU’s, “The cut of the uniform and a female’s body type usually leaves us looking like a duffel bag.”
http://www.military.com/news/article/army-tests-combat-uniform-designed-for-women.html
What special design uniform would have to be created to suit the openly gay, one with posterior flaps?
I feel in my gut that I am being disobedient to God by accepting as normal homosexuality. It is not normal. I will never treat someone who happens to be gay any different than I would treat a straight person of the same gender. The problem with the gay advocacy groups is they want non-gay people to accept their lifestyle as on par with straight lifestyles and it doesn’t make logical sense to me. Are there straight people who are terrible and gay people who are wonderful? Yep. But to determine someones social relevance based on sex acts is degrading to all peoples. If I was to be gay I’ll hide it and suffer the wrath when I meet the Lord. But I won’t demand my neighbor not flinch when Mike and I kiss like a couple at thanksgiving. Or not look away if I was holding Mikes hand in public.
Bumpers
They should allow the ad but only if it can be shown on Glenn Beck.
Well maybe if they're dykes but twinks I don't know about.
As soon as it becomes policy that openly homosexual people can participate in the armed forces, then they will assert themselves as a “protected” class. The Holder’s of the world will claim that military tribunals will not be adequate to protect their Constitutional rights and we will see civilian and Federal court cases brought by the ACLU against members of the Armed Forces being tried in civilian courts. These cases will be against officers and against fellow enlisted personnel.
Whats next, “Don’t LISP, don’t Swish”..
Placemarl for pingout.
Neff said the concern seemed to center on the ad’s opening line: “As the military prepares to end ‘Don’t ask, Don’t tell,’ our NATO allies have told us what to expect: Business as usual.”
Lie. This is the truth:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2608228/posts
Senate Testimony: European Militaries Are Not Role Models for U.S.
And this:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2608193/posts
The Center for Military Readiness ^ | 3/22/2010
Homosexual Assault in the Military
Family Reserch Council ^ | Peter Sprigg
“FRC has reviewed the “case synopses” of all 1,643 reports of sexual assault reported by the four branches of the military for Fiscal Year 2009 (October 1, 2008 through September 30, 2009). Our startling finding was that over eight percent (8.2%) of all military sexual assault cases were homosexual in nature. This suggests that homosexuals in the military are about three times more likely to commit sexual assaults than heterosexuals are, relative to their numbers.”
And the above doesn’t even take into account the numbers of homosexual assault that military members do not report out of shame.
Homosexuals DO NOT BELONG IN THE MILITARY! FIGHT IT!
And for more evidence:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1613341/posts
Has Homosexuality Always Been Incompatible With Military Service?
WallBuilders ^ | David Barton
All three articles are excellent and everyone who is interested in a strong military should read them.