Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeeSac

It’s not whether I’m serious or not... It’s just that I would like some concrete statements backed up with some verifiable information as to why one is better than another. You know, things like brand, options capabilities, good for CCW or not, what makes it better than say a GLOCK (like firing pin issues, craftsmanship, aesthetics, etc...) - you know specific details as to why someone despises a GLOCK and likes something else based on their experience. I know I can go to a firing range and spend some money buying their ammo and using one of their guns, but I’d like a more meaningful reason to spend the money than simply “I despise/detest GLOCKs”. I’d like to know why someone has formed that opinion to help me determine if there is something I haven’t considered that perhaps I should have based on my limited knowledge of the myriad options that do exist.

I was trying to politely ask for a nudge in the right direction, apparently I hit a nerve somewhere along the line. Sorry about that.


59 posted on 11/24/2010 9:51:14 AM PST by jurroppi1 (The gropings will continue until morale improves, or "don't TSA me bro")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: jurroppi1
but I’d like a more meaningful reason to spend the money than simply “I despise/detest GLOCKs”.

From your first post you specified you wanted a 1911. At that point, most of your above points have already been decided. If you want a 1911, try it out under the instruction of someone that knows 1911's and see how you like it. Ask them the advantages, disadvantages of the 1911 versus other auto's or revolvers. Visit gun stores and talk to the staff.

Now as to your wanting a nudge, try google 'best defense handgun'.

60 posted on 11/24/2010 10:09:55 AM PST by SeeSac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

To: jurroppi1
I'm sure that Glocks are well-engineered, reliable weapons, and that many people love them.

I've always thought they look and feel too "squarish" for my tastes. Personally, that's an issue for me.

62 posted on 11/24/2010 10:26:22 AM PST by Lou L (The Senate without a fillibuster is just a 100-member version of the House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson