“killed by Criminals”
Except some were killed by the “friendly fire” of other cops. Cops tend to start shooting and forget where the Hell they are at.
Let’s add another headline, “2,500 friendly dogs shot by cops since 2000.” I don’t really know how many family dogs were shot by cops, so I just picked a number. There have been more than we can count, though.
>“killed by Criminals”
>
>Except some were killed by the “friendly fire” of other cops. Cops tend to start shooting and forget where the Hell they are at.
Perhaps they are [unintentionally] being honest as they subconsciously realize that *MOST* police ARE criminals:
US Code, TITLE 18, PART I, CHAPTER 13, § 241 — § 241. Conspiracy against rights
If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or
If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured—
They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
Consider the $th Amendment, which says:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers,
and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be
violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause,
supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the
place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Pay attention to the portion after “No Warrants shall issue [...]”; it is the WARRANT that is supposed to be supported by oath or affirmation [of the “probable cause”] while the “probable cause” justification used by the police is used precisely to circumvent the requirement of a warrant. FURTHERMORE, a arrest based on some unconstitutional search/seizure is a false-arrest; and what is “kidnapping” other than the forcible and illegal taking of a person against their will? THEREFORE, *most* police are ELIGIBLE FOR THE DEATH PENALTY.