Skip to comments.
Might HMS Ark Royal's final farewell (British carrier)
Sunday Sun ^
| Nov 21 2010
| Rob Pattinson
Posted on 11/21/2010 6:42:36 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Farewell voyage: The Royal Navy's flagship the Ark Royal arrives on the River Tyne before making the short journey down the coast to Newcastle where she was built by Swan Hunters at Wallsend
(from the Daily Mail)
To: sukhoi-30mki
GB should sell it to Venezuela.
2
posted on
11/21/2010 6:50:17 AM PST
by
Paladin2
To: sukhoi-30mki
Will they keep it in reserve, sell it off, or scrap it?
3
posted on
11/21/2010 6:54:39 AM PST
by
reeb88
(How much fun are 72 virgins anyway? How much crying can one martyr take?)
To: reeb88
If they don’t mothball this perfectly good ship and keep her in reserve, then we will know the Brits have completely lost their minds.
With only 25 years of service, she’s probably not even reached half her useful life.
4
posted on
11/21/2010 7:00:48 AM PST
by
rottndog
(Be Prepared for what's coming AFTER America....)
To: sukhoi-30mki
That’s a carrier? Must be strictly helo’s and VTOL’s.
5
posted on
11/21/2010 7:22:55 AM PST
by
raybbr
(Someone who invades another country is NOT an immigrant - illegal or otherwise.)
To: reeb88
Will they keep it in reserve, sell it off, or scrap it?China will buy it.
6
posted on
11/21/2010 7:28:52 AM PST
by
BigBobber
To: reeb88
Will they keep it in reserve, sell it off, or scrap it?She is to be the tender for the George Soros.
7
posted on
11/21/2010 8:00:42 AM PST
by
seton89
(Mit der NY Dummheit, kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens.)
To: sukhoi-30mki
The likelihood of this happening to our fleet is far, far to real.
To: rottndog
In following a kinds of news stories about Britain over the past 10 years, it seems pretty clear that they have completely lost their minds, and their soul.
Britain is finished.
9
posted on
11/21/2010 8:13:55 AM PST
by
Jay W
To: magslinger
To: Red Dog #1
That would be a sad day. I served on board the USS Ranger and th JFK, both are gone,I believe.
11
posted on
11/21/2010 8:28:19 AM PST
by
brivette
To: sukhoi-30mki
Ungland... they were England when they were an Empire,
but then they became meek and became england.
Now they are appeasers and have become undone,
they are now UNgland...
12
posted on
11/21/2010 8:31:48 AM PST
by
Chode
(American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: sukhoi-30mki
I remember seeing seeing one of these in the Gulf the last time I was there but I don’t remember which one it was. For some reason I think it was HMS Invincible.
13
posted on
11/21/2010 10:03:27 AM PST
by
GATOR NAVY
("The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen." -Dennis Prager)
To: rottndog; reeb88
She will probably be scrapped. The story I have is that she is not in particularly good condition - a function of a very active service life.
14
posted on
11/22/2010 2:50:07 AM PST
by
Vanders9
To: raybbr
It is strictly helos and VTOL’s - but for its size (20,000 tons?) its a very useful ship.
15
posted on
11/22/2010 2:52:24 AM PST
by
Vanders9
To: Vroomfondel; SC Swamp Fox; Fred Hayek; NY Attitude; P3_Acoustic; investigateworld; lowbuck; ...
SONOBUOY PING!
Click on pic for past Navair pings.
Post or FReepmail me if you wish to be enlisted in or discharged from the Navair Pinglist.
The only requirement for inclusion in the Navair Pinglist is an interest in Naval Aviation.
This is a medium to low volume pinglist.
16
posted on
11/22/2010 12:55:10 PM PST
by
magslinger
('This is a United States Marine Corps FA-18 fighter. Send 'em up, I'll wait!')
To: Paladin2
Well, one place it won’t go to is Argentina, f’sure..But I’m surprised they don’t sell it to India...which is looking to upgrade its Navy..as a bulwark to China..so it would be in GB interest..
17
posted on
11/22/2010 1:12:27 PM PST
by
ken5050
(Palin.Bachman 2012 - FOUR boobs are better than the two we have now!)
To: Paladin2
Well, one place it won’t go to is Argentina, f’sure..But I’m surprised they don’t sell it to India...which is looking to upgrade its Navy..as a bulwark to China..so it would be in GB interest..
18
posted on
11/22/2010 1:12:41 PM PST
by
ken5050
(Palin/Bachman 2012 - FOUR boobs are better than the two we have now!)
To: ken5050
Im surprised they dont sell it to India...which is looking to upgrade its Navy..as a bulwark to China..so it would be in GB interest..
India is going the short take-off/arrested landing route with the former Soviet Navy's Gorshkov having been sold to them and in process of conversion to a mini-Kuznetsov that can handle carrier-capable MiG-29s. They plan to develop and build their own carriers after that.
ex-Gorshkov will give them MUCH more bang for buck than the Ark could. Even if the Brits were willing to sell the Indians the old Sea Harrier FA.2s with the radar (a deal to sell them fell through because the Brits wouldn't give Blue Vixen sets to the Indians), it would be better to operate the Shars off of Gorshkov.
And even though they need the capability as well, there's no way that the Aussies are going to take on a former RN carrier that's this close to the end of its service life.
To: tanknetter
Thanks..one follow-up..a few comments on the thread suggest that 25 years is NOT a long life..our CVNs last 50+ years..with one refueling at 25-30 years..
20
posted on
11/22/2010 1:34:59 PM PST
by
ken5050
(Palin/Bachman 2012 - FOUR boobs are better than the two we have now!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson