Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/19/2010 5:35:06 PM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

“GM “repaid” its loan with other taxpayer-provided bailout funds”

that says it all, for me. obamanation has them in his vice.

I wouldn’t drive a government motors vehicle if someone gave it to me..


2 posted on 11/19/2010 5:42:14 PM PST by bareford101 (For me, there is no difference in a tolerant, open mind and a cess pool. Both are open to filth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Where is the class action lawsuit (or individual suits) from the creditors and bond holders who were screwed illegally by the Gov’t?? Are they just too rich to care; paid off by TARp funds; threatened by Obama’s Chicago mafia? < crickets >


5 posted on 11/19/2010 5:49:46 PM PST by Thom Pain (November 2, 2010, Step ONE. Repeal 17th, Step TWO.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

There’s more math to be figured. The emphasis has been on Miles per Gallon. Calculate what I call “Dollars per MILE”.
Cost, even with taxpayer subsidy, depreciation, repairs, local taxes, gas (still needed), re-charging fees, INSURANCE, battery changes and more. I bet my “Dollar per Mile” cost for my Olds Custom Cruiser will be a whole lot less.
And I can drive from the middle of Mass. to lower Maine to visit the kids in one long trip, no stops. Up and back on one tank of gas.


6 posted on 11/19/2010 5:52:55 PM PST by CaptainAmiigaf ( NY Times: We print the news as it fits our views.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

General Moters seems to think it has sufficient funds to make political contributions, mostly Democrats, according to FoxNews. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/09/23/general-motors-resumes-political-contributions/


7 posted on 11/19/2010 5:53:31 PM PST by Mobties (Let the markets work! Reduce the government footprint!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
I peeked at the chart today for the stock price. Lot's of manipulation going on there IMO. The PPT has lots of practice.
8 posted on 11/19/2010 5:56:02 PM PST by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Notice that the retail investor wasn't even let in on this IPO, but of course China was. Here's my take, the price will run up initially, as the article said people will buy it figuring the government will bail it out in the event of a mistake. Any new factories will be built in China , so new jobs will be created, only not in the US.

Ultimately the price will rise and the shares will be sold to the public. However soon after that happens Wall St. will realize the government won't bail this out again , especially if Husein's numbers keep tanking. Those who got in late (the retail investor) will again be left holding the bag.

The final thing that nobody's mentioning in all the hype is the original bondholder who got $0.25 on the dollar (and was called greedy by Husein) and the owner of the old shares who rode it down hoping it would turn around, they get bupkus. Please feel free to point out where I'm wrong.

9 posted on 11/19/2010 5:56:40 PM PST by YankeeReb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

My son in law, who is in the finance industry, says that there’s a government fund to help retirees of companies whose own retirement plans failed to deliver. In other words, GM screwed their retirees and our government partially bailing them out. GM is one of the companies whose retirees are tapping into this government fund. Wonder how much that’s costing us?


10 posted on 11/19/2010 6:09:43 PM PST by frposty (I'm a simpleton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Still leaves out all the tax payers money that was piss away before the reorganization,


16 posted on 11/19/2010 7:08:39 PM PST by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Wow, IBD is hitting for the fences:

In short, there is no green future based on plug-in cars. Only losses for the indoctrinated suckers who buy them — and for the taxpayers who are fleeced to subsidize such economic folly.

I like it.

19 posted on 11/20/2010 5:04:13 AM PST by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson