Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Trust me. It's worth clicking on the link to see.....er....the article. Not exactly Andrea Mitchell.
1 posted on 11/19/2010 12:53:17 PM PST by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: Rational Thought

I really hate to think about what Bill O’Reilly has been doing this afternoon...


39 posted on 11/19/2010 1:06:30 PM PST by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rational Thought

.


43 posted on 11/19/2010 1:08:41 PM PST by dubie (The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rational Thought

It looks like I’ll be buying a GQ for the first time in my life.


44 posted on 11/19/2010 1:09:32 PM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rational Thought

How in the hell does she report the news without constantly feeling herself up on camera the whole time?


45 posted on 11/19/2010 1:09:57 PM PST by The KG9 Kid (l)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: numberonepal

Megyn Kelly Hottie Ping


50 posted on 11/19/2010 1:11:18 PM PST by llevrok (Born a ham but never cured)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rational Thought

Brains & beauty. She’s the whole package.


52 posted on 11/19/2010 1:11:59 PM PST by jazminerose (o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rational Thought

Knowing what the lead time is on magazine articles, this was probably mostly written and shot before she was pregnant. Hard to say; she certainly seems to be much better endowed in this photo than she has been in the past.

She is a truly beautiful woman. That said, she is wearing too much eye makeup in this picture. Her nose looks big, which is is certainly not in real life. She doesn’t even look like herself. Something is awry.


54 posted on 11/19/2010 1:13:01 PM PST by ottbmare (off-the-track Thoroughbred mare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rational Thought

Sorry, but she just classified herself with the many other “wanna see my boobs” no matter what she looks like.


61 posted on 11/19/2010 1:17:17 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rational Thought
I'll bet the commies at MSNBC are going to be shocked and outraged over this! They'll suddenly become bible-beating blue-nosed prudes, even as they demand gay marriage.
69 posted on 11/19/2010 1:30:09 PM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rational Thought

She passed very close by a FReep one day.....

76 posted on 11/19/2010 1:33:56 PM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... History is a process, not an event)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rational Thought

The pose is tacky and slutty.

Based on her work at Fox, Megyn does not strike me as tacky and slutty.

This is disappointing.
Slutty is not sexy.
One can be sexy with virtue intact.
But slutty is NEVER virtuous.


77 posted on 11/19/2010 1:35:34 PM PST by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rational Thought

At least she still covered up her “I love pissant” tattoo.


80 posted on 11/19/2010 1:37:07 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rational Thought

I find her more attractive in her typical anchor appearances. She’s a real doll. These sexy, come-hither photo-shoots, however, are rather dime-a-dozen nowadays, and strike me as underwhelming. Putting it another way, she’s already both so ‘hot’ and so talented, such a photo-shoot is kind of like slumming. A bit unwise. Especially taking the nature of her profession into consideration.


82 posted on 11/19/2010 1:39:47 PM PST by greene66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rational Thought
In the interest of the coming Fairness Doctrine - the opposing view:


92 posted on 11/19/2010 1:52:04 PM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rational Thought

Conservatives aren’t as uptight as liberals seem to think ...

... and nothing brings the uptight to the forefront like a picture of a pretty conservative woman showing even a little skin.

SnakeDoc


93 posted on 11/19/2010 1:52:12 PM PST by SnakeDoctor (Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum -- If you wish for peace, prepare for war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rational Thought
OK, I admit I clicked on this thread to read the comments...
94 posted on 11/19/2010 1:52:43 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter ( Sarah Palin - For such a time as this...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rational Thought

What a disappointment. Sorry, Megyn ... FAIL ...


98 posted on 11/19/2010 1:55:07 PM PST by mlizzy (Hail Mary, full of grace, the Lord is with thee ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GOP Golfer

Our girl reports for duty on GQ. You decide :-). I guess you were right too. She is pregnant with number two.


102 posted on 11/19/2010 1:59:22 PM PST by GOP Poet (Obama is an OLYMPIC failure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rational Thought

“Look at me, I’m a slut!”


113 posted on 11/19/2010 2:21:55 PM PST by GeronL (http://libertyfic.proboards.com <--- My Fiction/ Science Fiction Board)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rational Thought

I haven’t read GQ in ages but that is one article I just have to read.


116 posted on 11/19/2010 2:23:57 PM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson