[STARWISE]

I would hope you’ll reconsider the insanity of that logic
in the morning.

Just broaden it out .. let’s say:

how ‘bout Obama pardons Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani,
convicted of just one count out of 285 .. for the US
embassy bombings in East Africa .. because in his
mind he thinks there must be something amiss if the
jury only found him guilty of just one of those many
counts.

How’s that sound ?

[Louis Foxwell]

Obama’s pardon of a terrorist? Wait for it....

[Navy Patriot]

how ‘bout Obama pardons Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani, convicted of just one count out of 285 .. for the US embassy bombings in East Africa .. because in his mind he thinks there must be something amiss

Obviously, unlike Obama, you believe there was nothing amiss in this trial.

Again, there was plenty of law, it was all over the place. That's all we need, law.

How about Obama, in his mind, he thinks there must be something amiss, so he orders Ahmed shot behind the courthouse?