Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kackikat

“and not be as polarizing as Bush or Palin”

Polarizing? You don’t want to be on the opposite pole from Evil?

If a candidate doesn’t drive the leftards into a slavering, convulsing, howling, puking, chewing-their-own-lips-off, full-blown “Exorcist” seizure, that candidate is not morally fit for office.

This is war, pooky. They want you dead. They might let you live as a slave, just so they’d have somebody to torment.

These people are capital “E” Evil. They are not to be “worked with” or appeased. Nothing less than total victory is remotely adequate, and that means that they have absolutely *no* voice in anything.

Polarizing? I am astounded that someone who purports to be a conservative would be reluctant to offend the vile scoundrels that have laid seige to the freedom of the human race.


84 posted on 11/19/2010 12:16:07 AM PST by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: dsc

Obviously you don’t understand, and are just like the Anarchists on the other side, buzzhead. Of course we want them acting as you said, but our candidate must not have acted like an idiot, and done things that can be PERCEIVED as unfit for service!

We need stable, and clean candidates, whose mental health or children’s actions we won’t be questioning later! For example the best candidates are people like Pence, Boehner, Cantor or DeMint....or someone focused on the issues WITHOUT THE BAGGAGE.

People who have questionable pasts or behaviors like MA Obamacare by Mitt Romney, or Gingrich, who had affairs, and had to resign as Speaker...that’s okay for Clinton, but not for a conservative candidate for President, although Gingrich has done a great service in his writing, and as a spokesperson on Fox.

I promoted Bush in 2000 and 2004, and I think he was a very good President, until last two years, but he was tired or set up by marxists against capitalism, terrorists, natural disasters , fires in CA, then 2008 Lehman, Paulson, and FDIC act to let Obama Win...and he did not see it coming. I haven’t read the book yet, so I won’t comment on that any further.

I agree that Palin is a great Conservative, but we need to be drawing attention to Obama’s mistakes and lies as President (but I’d rather see him impeached) during 2012 election. It is hard to unseat a current President in second election. Conservatives need to be making a list of his mistakes for ads.

I voted for Palin... not McCain, however her family will suffer greatly, if she runs in 2012, and don’t you care about that? Every single thing they have done since last election has been documented and scrutinized by every leftist journalist out there, just in case she runs.

Palin has a huge voice in the next election, and is untouchable as a private citizen, but if she runs it will be political suicide for her, for the left the gloves come off. It will be all about her and her family, not the issues, policies or things that need to be done. It will give Obama the advantage.
.
Just because you don’t like what I said doesn’t make it any less valid.


86 posted on 11/19/2010 12:11:07 PM PST by Kackikat (There is no such thing as a free lunch, because someone paid, somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson