> “The media has savaged her image, probably irredeemably. It’s not fair. But it’s true.”
.
No, it’s not true. - The media attacks are actually the key factor in her rapid rise to the top in all the polls.
> “She simply has no serious record of accomplishment”
.
Really an idiotic statement. She has one of the longest and strongest lists of accomplishment of any of the candidates of the last 100 years. She is probably the most accomplished and influential leaders in the history of the state of Alaska:
Governor Sarah Palin’s Accomplishments - http://www.palinpromotions.com/blog/2010/07/25/governor-sarah-palins-accomplishments/
> “She has left no trail of spending a lot of time considering great issues”
.
More blithering idiocy. Her WSJ and Wash Times op-eds, plus her Facebook articles amount to the largest compendium of policy positions by any presidential candidate in the history of American politics.
> “ I’m sorry, but the fact is that she does come across as fairly shallow...”
.
Only to those that are themselves quite shallow, like the author of the post to which I respond.
You cannot have spent more than five minutes assembling this far-left wish list of empty dreams.
Your pal Gingrich has contemplated nothing but the glory of global socialism, and Jim DeMint (who I personally like) comes off like gomer Pyle in a $1000 suit when he speaks.
A few Op-Eds and FACEBOOK articles? These are your indicia of her intellectual bona fides?
And you scoff at a PhD who has written a dozen or so nonfiction books and a half-dozen historical counterfactual novels?
Gotcha.
Hank
I think she's neck and neck with Ike, Reagan and TR