Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: onyx

“Us” is the US. If she ran, she’d lose. Sarah herself would win, but they’d be able to make enough of her “quitting” her job in Alaska to ruin things for her. If we underestimate the ability of the left to spin her past decisions, we’re in for it.

It’s imperative that we run a safer candidate in 2010 like McDonnell, Christy, Rubio, Bachmann, someone like that. Not some “moderate” or a RINO, but a less controversial character.

(Was Rasmussen as accurate in 2010 as he has been in the past?)


418 posted on 11/17/2010 7:31:49 PM PST by Feline_AIDS (A gun in hand is better than a cop on the phone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 413 | View Replies ]


To: Feline_AIDS
LOL. A "safer" candidate? Don't you realize that every conservative candidate will be villified?

Who's going to bring out the conservatives to vote?

Who attracts the crowds and can raise money equal to Barch Hussein Obama, if not more?

Sarah Palin is the only one right now and I don't see another out there who comes close to her.

438 posted on 11/17/2010 8:44:44 PM PST by onyx (If you truly support Sarah Palin and want on her busy ping list, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 418 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson