No one’s calling for a ban. Calm down.
“No one’s calling for a ban. Calm down.”
Really?
“No link. 2010 sign up. I think you might be going bye-bye.”
Maybe you would like to rephrase that?
This is a typical Palin thread. Someone makes a post that in some way casts negative light on something Palinish. The Palin groupies show up, bash the poster, call for his banishment (or I guess maybe you were suggesting he get an all-expense-paid vacation for his efforts?), argue that it's fake, it's slander, etc. etc. etc..
Sometimes, the facts are verified, and then the palinists pretend like nothing ever happened, while they change their entire arguments to defend what they previously denied happened.
Meanwhile, the "defense" against being banished for posting an article which is seen as negative is to count how many good things the poster said about Palin. The more, they better. Passing the ideological purity test innoculates you from some of the knee-jerk reaction.
It's always entertaining.