Posted on 11/14/2010 3:38:40 PM PST by kristinn
Right, work with them up until the night of the long knives, uhuh. They can not be trusted. Sorry, but that's the nature of moral degenerates who hide in the closet with a spinning moral compass.
Politics is a dirty business and the majority of the American people who sent these folks up there to DO that job aren't capable of surviving in the cesspool that is DC. The purpose of party politics (besides doing the people's business) is to win for the party agenda. The B-I-G picture. If these idiots are on the Hill and they have a vote, WE have to include them for as long as we need their votes. That doesn't mean we can't marginalize them or even let them know that they don't call the shots, but we do need to work with what we've got to work with and that would include the RATs who are feeling the heat and want to stay in their jobs.
Work with everybody as much as possible to shove our agenda along until we control the game. THEN we can get out the broom and clean the House! To do otherwise is not only foolish, it is wasting our shot. We absolutely cannot afford to waste the shot!
Welcome to Free Republic. Been here a whole 12 days and this is your first post? Been lurking for awhile?
I see where we're not connecting now.I'm talking about the (non-elected) Liberal Pirates now calling themselves the "Tea Party" who wrote the letter and essentially demanded their social agenda not be interfered with - while they are also trying to unexist the fact that a substantial portion of the real individuals who participated in real Tea Party events were Socially as well as Fiscally conservative.You're talking about the elected representatives those pirates are attempting to command.
That's common sense. I agree.What remains to be seen is which of these newly elected representatives, if any, constitutes "them" i.e. Social Liberals - maybe none at all.Hopefully none at all, and the Liberal Pirates are merely barking desperately from the outside, in which case I hope the freshmen IGNORE those outside special interest voices - and vote per the Truth in their conscience and input from their individual district constituents. Not per any "party" directive - RINO, Tea, or otherwise.
Keep fighting the good fight!!
My 10 y/o daughter is absolutely fascinated by the video—awestruck that she was created in God’s image in the same way. :*)
I have hope for the future of this country when I see her reaction to the preciousness of LIFE. :*)
“And all this is really ok in the name of irresponsible sex. I think your sense of morality is screwd up.”
I think you’ve posted to the wrong person.
!
There are personal issues and government issues...when you try to turn your personal issues into government issues you give permission for others to do that ...this is how the p.c. crowd has won so much social control allreaddy...
And now they have basically taken over our society.
The only answers are...
constitution,
freedom,
smaller gov.
less taxes.
Would you rather have freedom...or control over how other people live?
The founding fathers were christian...christianity used to need no promotion...people were attracted to it...they saw happy people living a good life...who were free to choose that path....
I dont know...but I cannot accept...the restrictive socialist concepts...or the criminality that is islam.
I think its time to concentrate on freedom again...more inportant than safety,or well anything else.
gltua
Sexual deviancy, abortion, euthanasia, assisted suicide, healthcare rationing, infanticide, unnatural marriage, anti-religious policies, anti-tradition policies are all unethical, immoral and atheistic socialist agendas. And, yes, they are social and cultural issues.
Any group that embraces this death culture, as mentioned above, is anti-American, atheistic, secularist, socialist, and does not belong to any authentic Tea Party ideal.
I had not seen that video and thank you so much for posting the link. Absolutely beautiful!
I admit I haven't read all the posts yet, but I have a feeling that after finishing, what I've read will show that this is exactly what they are trying.
And very well might succeed.
Does that mean I should tolerate a pro-abortion, pro-gay marriage republican who wants me to believe he's a conservative just because he believes in balancing his checkbook?
Does that mean I shouldn't ask the question?
1. It is IMPOSSIBLE for a pro-gay, pro-abortionist to be conservative.
2. I don't want them in my camp, because they will always stab you in the back.
Killing children is a government issue. Unfortunately, our government has it backwards.
Marriage, too, has always been a government issue. The state as well as the church has always been concerned in it.
If gays want to do their thing privately, that’s their business. But they cannot force gay marriage on our country. And they cannot force the military to accept gay activities in the barracks—any more than they can force the military to accept open adultery among its officers.
And they cannot force gay brainwashing on our children in the public schools.
Yet they are trying to do all these things. Not acceptable. Not a matter of private choice, either.
Are you by chance a former USMC Gunnery Sergeant? Because the only other time I have heard this term is on the Geico commercial where R. Lee Ermy is playing a psychologist as an example of how not to act... it was hilarious but I have no idea what a jackwagon actually IS and I'm a former infantry captain!
Exactly!
Congress debates thousands of heated issues every year. We don't have to avoid "divisive" issues like deregulation of veterinary medication, in order to get our nation's fiscal house in order. We can walk AND chew gum at the same time.
Fascinating. You figure by now people would learn to just sit down and STFU.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.