The cameraman never said that. He said he “observed” it for ten minutes. He never specified (anywhere that I have seen or heard) what part of the video began at what time in relation to when he first observed it. The video itself records the frame in question occurring less than a minute and forty seconds from his earliest recording.
The cameraman never said that. He said he “observed” it for ten minutes. He never specified (anywhere that I have seen or heard) what part of the video began at what time in relation to when he first observed it. The video itself records the frame in question occurring less than a minute and forty seconds from his earliest recording.
This is correct. And accurate.