Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Seizethecarp; LucyT; Red Steel; El Gato; Fred Nerks; little jeremiah; butterdezillion; Danae
Well, with all due respect, all his years at Columbia University are totally obscured!

Nobody have ever seen him or his shadow there in classes or on the school grounds, none, nada. Transition with questionable grades from Occidental to prestige Columbia, hmmm!!

You just tell me WHERE he was then, because nobody else know. His mother's and grandmother's whereabouts in this mix is equally totally shaded. Then we have the "links" as to how he entered into Harvard, another hmmm!!!

How is the process when "double" agents are "ringed in"???

91 posted on 11/13/2010 5:12:47 AM PST by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: danamco; LucyT
Obama was a true-believing Marxist-Leninist by the time he left Occidental, according to an eyewitness who became a professor later. Obama could well have been making contacts with the Marxist academic infrastructure in NYC, where Ayers was also ensconced at the time. These folks could have eased Obama’s transition to Columbia during the aggressive affirmative action environment at the time, which also benefited Sotomayor by her own admission.

Obama was only at Columbia for the last two undergrad years. Junior and senior year students don't go through the “Animal House” bonding that freshman experience where they engage in lots of activities and meet lots of people, but rather live off-campus and study. Also, the upper level courses are far more demanding especially after 50% and the original party-happy freshman have been flushed out of the school and the seriously competitive students remain.

We have accounts and pictures of Obama at Columbia from his two apparently gay roommates, one of which was Pakistani. There are many things they won't talk about but there are telephone listings for Obama at low-rent apartments near Columbia, which back up his residence there at that time.

The best evidence for me is the article on nuclear proliferation that he wrote in his very poor English for a left-wing rag which expresses the same lunatic unilateral disarmament themes (KGB approved to undermine the US).

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/05/world/05nuclear.html

See this complaint in the NY Times Op-Ed by Roger Cohen this week calling these same ideas “dangerous illusions”! This is the best evidence that Obama was at Columbia and hasn't change a bit from the KGB party line he learned in 1980.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/12/opinion/12iht-edcohen.html

96 posted on 11/13/2010 7:30:17 AM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson