The only problem with this is that one of the newspapers in question published a story about the birth announcement being in its newspaper. Presumably they have access to their own morgue and would be honest enough to confirm that such an announcement actually ran in the paper. That's why I called this the best 'available' evidence. The idea that the microfiche (from multiple sources including the newspaper) has been doctored is fairly credible but not conclusive on its own until hard copies of the newspaper emerge and can disprove that the announcement ran as has been shown.
I mean you no disrespect, but I can’t engage in the “presume” or “suppose” game. I have thousands of reports in The Obama File. Many of them are contradictory.
I have repeatedly written that the more I read about Obama, the less I KNOW about him. His mythology is replelte with holes, lies, misinformation, contradictions, and more lies.
I never suggested that the microfilm/microfiche was doctored. I have no evidence of that.
I want the original newspaper examined by a forensic document examiner.
I did have to chuckle at newspaper and honest in the same sentence.
Cheers . . .
but not conclusive on its own until hard copies of the newspaper emerge
_______________________
tic tock tic tock