Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sheikdetailfeather

“why he did not defend himself against attacks, etc..”

Because he didn’t have time to argue with idiots?


13 posted on 11/09/2010 10:57:51 AM PST by Marty62 (Marty 60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Marty62
“why he did not defend himself against attacks, etc..” Because he didn’t have time to argue with idiots?

The HUGE problem with that is that if one does not defend oneself, the allegations are TAKEN TO BE TRUE ! ! !

Bush had to be stupid or on the take somehow not to know that.

It is a legal principle that if a defendant says nothing, it is an admission of GUILT.

The idea is that an innocent person would ALWAYS deny a false allegation.

15 posted on 11/09/2010 11:02:26 AM PST by Huebolt (It's not over until there is not ONE DEMOCRAT HOLDING OFFICE ANYWHERE. Not even a dog catcher!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Marty62

Excellent reply. Needless to say that he has class


33 posted on 11/09/2010 12:00:21 PM PST by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson