Does anyone believe the fuel tank “story” anymore? I was working for a defense contractor at the time of TWA and it was a known fact that it wasn’t a fuel tank explosion. Of course, what I heard is that it wasn’t a bomb, but a missile test gone very bad...
I will repeat my story about the TWA 800 coverage that day.
I happened to be home, watching cable network news. I heard the initial breaking news about the crash, and BEFORE ANYONE HAD EVEN REPORTED IT MIGHT BE A MISSILE, within 5 minutes of the initial report, there was a graphic on TV that explained how it could not have been a missile, but was the nose ascending after the explosion.
The watermark on the computer-generated graphic video was NSA (and then spelled out) National Security Agency.
Kinda odd for the NSA to put out a graphic within 5 minutes of the event claiming it couldn't have been a missile, when no one had even mentioned missile yet.
Later, the same graphic was rebranded FAA and replayed extensively.
That's when I knew something nefarious had gone on.
They killed the TWA to cover Clinton’s mistake.
Which is the theory I lean towards but when Stephonopolous was in such a panic his stream of thoughts rattled off the word “bombing” and said it while we were under attack.