Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SmartInsight

The Democrats were never interested in compromise the past two years they ran Washington.

And the MSM talks of a “hardline GOP agenda?” That’s not what it called the Democrats’ ramming socialism down our throats.

Let me state the message very clearly: Elections have consequences. We won. End of discussion.


4 posted on 11/07/2010 1:50:22 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: goldstategop; truthandlife

Even now the Dem’s definition of compromise is for the GOP to roll over and go along with the Dems, not for the Dems to compromise.

Pelosi move is a sign that Democrats intend to fight the GOP, not cut deals

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2623204/posts

“Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s aim to remain the leader of House Democrats is an indication the party is ready to go to war with Republicans in the next Congress, not cut deals across the aisle. “


6 posted on 11/07/2010 1:53:53 PM PST by SmartInsight (Bad officials are elected by good citizens who do not vote. ~ G. J. Nathan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: goldstategop

The Democrats were never interested in compromise the past two years they ran Washington.

Correctomuundo! The Demorats’ definition of compromise was for Repubs to sign on to the Dems’ bound-to-fail agenda so they (Repubs) could share the blame.


14 posted on 11/07/2010 2:27:43 PM PST by luvbach1 (Stop Barry now. He can't help himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson