Replies

You must be a lawyer.

Ha!

The pure hypocrisy of that statement of yours is mind-boggling.

You start out by saying Sarah has no experience, and when I prove that the founder of our party had less experience, and made similar decisions in his career you switch gears, JUST LIKE A LAWYER.

What you should have done is admit your were wrong and then make your next point. But

Lincoln, like Reagan, was a man of vision. Both wanted to change the world and they both did. Sarah, like the Bushes and Clinton, just wants to be the boss. When referencing Reagan or Lincoln, she cannot be even remotely compared. I had to memorize the Gettyburg address in school, so I know the difference.

Do you even read anything that Sarah states?

Have you paid attention at all to her speeches lately?

Does this sound like somebody who just wants to be the Boss?

"If we manage to do these things, there is no reason why we can't look forward with confidence to winning in 2012. I have said all along that this election must be seen in conjunction with the next. Ultimately 2010 must be viewed as just the first battle in a much longer fight that leads to November 6, 2012, and beyond. We cannot fully restore and revive America until we replace Obama. The meaning of the 2010 election was rebuke, reject, and repeal. We rebuked Washington's power grab, rejected this unwanted "fundamental transformation of America," and began the process to repeal the dangerous policies inflicted on us. But this theme will only complement the theme of 2012, which is renew, revive, and restore. In 2012, we need to renew our optimistic, pioneering spirit, revive our free-market system, and restore constitutional limits and our standing in the world as the abiding beacon of freedom. "

Read the whole article by Sarah so that you don't embarrass yourself again

You're fighting with an empty weapon.

Get back to me when you have educated yourself.

Get back to me when you have educated yourself.

You are the one who compared her to Lincoln. And unlike Sarah, he wrote this all by himself:

Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.

Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battle-field of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.

But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate -- we can not consecrate -- we can not hallow -- this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us -- that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion -- that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain -- that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom -- and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.

Sarah detractors are firing blanks.

The entire lamestream has taken their best and most vile shots at her for over two years and counting, and they’re out of ammo.

Now it’s the RINO’S turn and they’re weak sisters...LOL.

Same goes for the anti-Palin posters here.