Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Accurate? Can anybody here back up these statements with sources? This is a really strong argument, if this is all true.
1 posted on 11/04/2010 2:34:47 PM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
To: afraidfortherepublic

I’ve been pointing this out to dear leader’s followers for months and the usual response is a total ignore.


2 posted on 11/04/2010 2:38:09 PM PDT by RWB Patriot ("My ability is a value that must be purchased and I don't recognize anyone's need as a claim on me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic

Ping for later


3 posted on 11/04/2010 2:38:44 PM PDT by erod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic

I once saw a graph posted here that had a line chart representing the deficit and an area chart that showed the party in charge of the house over time. It covered the last 40 years. I wish I could find that chart again.


4 posted on 11/04/2010 2:39:00 PM PDT by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic

well i remember it and wondered why Republicans did not bring it up. but its probably because the did not want to bring up GW to the rabid left. there is a lot they should have defended
GW for. They also should have heeded his words when he asked them to send a conservative budget to him.


5 posted on 11/04/2010 2:39:33 PM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic
This is similar to the myth of the "Reagan Tax Cuts causing a massive deficit".

The Donkey-dominated House of the 1980s (O'Neill, Rostenkowski and the whole gang of idiots) was the entity that pushed all the massive spending bills through, squandering the extra revenue from the tax-cut-expanded economy.

8 posted on 11/04/2010 2:40:38 PM PDT by rfp1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic

I had recived this email too. Sent it to some liberal friends...no reply.


9 posted on 11/04/2010 2:40:51 PM PDT by Rennes Templar (Figures don't lie, but liars can figure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic

it is very accurate - you can look up topics like budget by fiscal year and see that this is a very good post - it is also the type of FACT that will never be well told - not e4ven by John Boenher or any other leader in congress.


10 posted on 11/04/2010 2:41:58 PM PDT by q_an_a (a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic
Accurate? Can anybody here back up these statements with sources? This is a really strong argument, if this is all true.
If you plot the number of Republican senators, and the number of Republican Congressmen, alongside a plot of the Dow-Jones, I think you will see consistent positive correlation.

11 posted on 11/04/2010 2:43:45 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (DRAFT PALIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic

someone i know posted a picture of Bush on their facebook page with the caption. “i screwed you. but thanks for blaming it on the black guy”


12 posted on 11/04/2010 2:45:10 PM PDT by sappy (criminalibs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic

Betcha the liberals and their latchkeys in the LSM will be able to readily recall their ninth grade civics lessons as soon as the Republicans take control of congress. All of sudden the ignorant liberal masses will become experts in the separation of power of the three branches. Hell they might even be able to name the three branches of government as outlined in the ninth grade class


13 posted on 11/04/2010 2:47:24 PM PDT by ebersole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic
Bush should get at least some credit for the deficit. Because he asked for the spending for the war (which I support), and he asked for TARP (which I supported, although I didn't like the switch in method after it was sold).

But Bush did keep the war separate from the budget, because the War was a temporary cost that shouldn't continue to recur.

Obama combined the war costs into the budget first thing, so as the war winds down, he'll be able to spend the war money on other things.

16 posted on 11/04/2010 2:48:35 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic

And do not forget that Bush seldom if ever vetoed any spending bill. Gave away a billon dollars of our tax money for AIDS research, I mean stole the money from taxpayers and is also a BIG RINO along with Rove.

Also, doubled the size of the DOE, created the BIGGEST transfer of walth in our nations history with his prescription drug benefit for seniors.

So let’s all remember when we are defending GW Bush that he was also along with his dad a socialist, like all the RINO’s in fairy land at the RNC.


18 posted on 11/04/2010 2:49:42 PM PDT by stockpirate ("......When the government fears the people you have liberty." Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic

BOOKMARK.


24 posted on 11/04/2010 3:10:06 PM PDT by IrishCatholic (No local Communist or Socialist Party Chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic

This seems to be accurate.


27 posted on 11/04/2010 3:15:23 PM PDT by Cheetahcat (Zero the Wright kind of Racist! We are in a state of War with Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic

-- from THIS page, where there's a story

28 posted on 11/04/2010 3:19:32 PM PDT by FreeKeys (The 'rats beg for "ideas" to cure the economy. But GC, WGH, JFK and RWR ALREADY proved what works!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic

The media is either too lazy or too dim to follow the actions of 535 senators and congressmen. So much easier to keep your sights on the Oval Office. Why should they bother to get it right?


29 posted on 11/04/2010 3:24:17 PM PDT by Oratam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic

Who signed the devestating legislation that came out of Dodd’s and Frank’s commettes?


31 posted on 11/04/2010 3:26:11 PM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic

Our problems started before Bush, but Bush and Obama share a lot of blame for the way this economic mess has been handled.


32 posted on 11/04/2010 3:27:37 PM PDT by Captain Peter Blood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic
I also use Congress to argue that the surplus was not due to Clinton's policies except in that the revenues that caused the surplus were originally intended by Democrats to pay for Hilliarycare, but that Republicans refused to spend them.

All in all, Republicans, while hardly perfect, have been consistently far better stewards of the Federal Budget than Democrats have been over the last 30 years, at least.

33 posted on 11/04/2010 3:30:25 PM PDT by Post Toasties
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic

You can always count on the Democrats to run up huge debts and weaken national security.


34 posted on 11/04/2010 3:31:46 PM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson