Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: markomalley

....Williams is correct...1861-1865 was not a civil war...it was a war of secession and partition....we’ve had three of those so far: 1776,1832,1861...those were based on politics...the coming one will be tribal, and if I were betting on it; the Southwest will be where it will start.


11 posted on 11/04/2010 4:16:52 AM PDT by STONEWALLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: STONEWALLS
....Williams is correct...1861-1865 was not a civil war...it was a war of secession and partition....we’ve had three of those so far: 1776,1832,1861...those were based on politics...the coming one will be tribal, and if I were betting on it; the Southwest will be where it will start.

You neglected the Essex Junto and Hartford Convention in New England, when that region flirted with secessionism--and were accused of treason by "states' rights" defending Southerners.

71 posted on 11/04/2010 7:45:25 AM PDT by Zionist Conspirator ("Haqol qol Ya`aqov vehadayim yedey `Esav.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson