[Darkwolf377]

Frankly, unless we had a really aggressive, tough-minded, take-no-prisoner senate leadership which we don't, not getting the senate is probably a blessing.

Christine O'Donnell didn't do anything wrong.

You had me until that last line.

Christine O'Donnell is incompatible with the kind of aggressive, tough-minded representation you want. I've heard her speak in debate situations and friendly FOX ones, and she doesn't have the intellectual heft for the job. Not just to be a senator, but the KIND of senator you correctly describe.

We can't be wishy-washy if we want our leadership (and the rank-and-file) to be warriors, not little maidens who talk about witches and "I'm you."

[Tribune7]

Christine O'Donnell is incompatible with the kind of aggressive, tough-minded representation you want.

But she's far more compatible than Mike Castle would be who would actually collaborate with the enemy.

Patty Murray -- who does not collaborate with us at all and whom I think Christine is much smarter than -- is very useful to the Dems. Same thing with regard to comparative intellect could be said about Bob Casey Jr. & Joe Biden.

At this point, I'm much rather have a fighter than a thinker and say what you want Christine is a fighter.