[Zionist Conspirator]

Where did you get the idea that I rejected anything in the TaNa"KH? Of course G-d sent Nathan to David to rebuke him, and to sentence his unborn child to death! David was a great tzaddiq and held to a very high standard. Even though he was not technically guilty of murder or adultery he had committed a great sin and was punished accordingly.

[OneWingedShark]

Where did you get the idea that I rejected anything in the TaNa"KH? Of course G-d sent Nathan to David to rebuke him, and to sentence his unborn child to death! David was a great tzaddiq and held to a very high standard. Even though he was not technically guilty of murder or adultery he had committed a great sin and was punished accordingly.

Hmmm, thank you. I now have an understanding of something that eluded me before: the reason behind Jesus saying to Peter "Get behind me Satan!"
The utterances you have just uttered are so utterly repugnant that they could only have come from the Father of Lies.

How can you possibly believe God to be so unjust as to a) allow loopholes in His law, b) hold one to account for "not technically violating" said laws, and c) hold to a second/differing standard these "great tzaddiq"?
Righteousness is righteousness and Sin is sin; this is regardless of the position someone has been placed in or the authority given them.