Skip to comments.
The President Plans a Post-Mortem (Will call for renewed focus on bipartisanship)
NYT ^
| Tuesday November 2, 2010
| Peter Baker
Posted on 11/02/2010 11:01:31 AM PDT by Bigtigermike
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
To: Bigtigermike
So then Obama will leave the TelePrompter behind that he used to encourage one group of Americans to "punish"another group of Americans, correct?
Where was bipartisanship with ObamaCare? "I won," remember?
Just like campaign finance reform, what Democrats really want is for Republicans to surrender their advantage.
21
posted on
11/02/2010 11:13:30 AM PDT
by
Obadiah
(BHO -- out the door in 4)
To: Bigtigermike
Oh one more thing. Do not believe him.
22
posted on
11/02/2010 11:14:01 AM PDT
by
ColdOne
To: Obadiah
To: Bigtigermike
bipartisan NOW?
uhm bye bambam....
WE WON!
24
posted on
11/02/2010 11:15:27 AM PDT
by
eeevil conservative
(GIVE ME A PLACE TO STAND AND I WILL MOVE THE EARTH....Archimedes)
To: Bigtigermike
Exile, not bipartisanship.
25
posted on
11/02/2010 11:18:54 AM PDT
by
jimbo123
To: Bigtigermike
O.K. another thing.. how about repealing Obamacare? that would be bipartisanship.......I didn’t think so!
26
posted on
11/02/2010 11:19:11 AM PDT
by
ColdOne
To: Bigtigermike
“The President Plans a Post-Mortem (Will call for renewed focus on bipartisanship)”
The proper - and only - Republican/Tea Party response (it ain’t “just the Republicans” any more!) should be:
“Stuff it!”
27
posted on
11/02/2010 11:19:47 AM PDT
by
Grumplestiltskin
(I may look new, but it's only deja vu!)
To: Bigtigermike
and signal that he heard what the voters were trying to tell him.
NØ
Can - you - hear - us - NOW?
.
28
posted on
11/02/2010 11:21:00 AM PDT
by
TLI
( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
To: Bigtigermike
The proper Republican response should be something like the following:
Sit down over here and shut up Barry, you’ll do as you’re told...
To: ColdOne
I don’t believe him nor do I believe he is capable of bi-partisanship.
I don’t want bi-partisanship. When one side is wrong and you meet them halfway you are going in the wrong direction! I don’t think McCain/Grahamesty understand this and I expect plenty of in-fighting between the GOP house and the Senate no matter who controls it.
I am 100% certain we are in for a very nasty and partisan environment in D.C. and the GOP better get their butts in gear because the other side may be motivated next time.
30
posted on
11/02/2010 11:25:04 AM PDT
by
volunbeer
(Dear heaven.... we really need President Reagan again!)
To: ColdOne
I don’t believe him nor do I believe he is capable of bi-partisanship.
I don’t want bi-partisanship. When one side is wrong and you meet them halfway you are going in the wrong direction! I don’t think McCain/Grahamesty understand this and I expect plenty of in-fighting between the GOP house and the Senate no matter who controls it.
I am 100% certain we are in for a very nasty and partisan environment in D.C. and the GOP better get their butts in gear because the other side may be motivated next time.
31
posted on
11/02/2010 11:25:11 AM PDT
by
volunbeer
(Dear heaven.... we really need President Reagan again!)
To: Bigtigermike
Will “The One” be taking questions? I would ask him “Dude, what do you take away from the result that your enemies in Arizona overwhelmingly re-elected Jan Brewer governor?”
32
posted on
11/02/2010 11:27:27 AM PDT
by
Hotlanta Mike
(Countdown to Returning to Constitutional Principles)
To: WinOne4TheGipper
Renewed focus? PUH-LEEZE. What happened to “I won” and shoving everything down the throats of America?
To: Bigtigermike
Patient Zero blaming everyone else for spreading the disease.
34
posted on
11/02/2010 11:30:01 AM PDT
by
ShandaLear
(The price of Obamacare? 30 pieces of silver.)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
35
posted on
11/02/2010 11:30:40 AM PDT
by
diji
(IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE, FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM !)
To: Bigtigermike
Barry, the ONLY bipartisanship is going to be YOU coming around to what your new Congress proposes. You aren’t running the legislature anymore.
36
posted on
11/02/2010 11:31:20 AM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(The establishment clause isn't just against my OWN government establishing state religion in America)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
That is the funniest thing I have seen all year!
37
posted on
11/02/2010 11:32:35 AM PDT
by
eeevil conservative
(GIVE ME A PLACE TO STAND AND I WILL MOVE THE EARTH....Archimedes)
To: Bigtigermike
Aides said they expected Mr. Obama to call for an end to the division that characterized the campaign and for a renewed focus on bipartisanship to solve the nation’s economic and other problems. F off Barry. In your own words, you lost, we won ... elections have consequences.
38
posted on
11/02/2010 11:34:19 AM PDT
by
tx_eggman
(Liberalism is only possible in that moment when a man chooses Barabas over Christ.)
To: maggief; STARWISE
To: Bigtigermike
40
posted on
11/02/2010 11:35:54 AM PDT
by
william clark
(Ecclesiastes 10:2)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
