Posted on 11/02/2010 8:46:30 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
DNC memo blames Bush for impending midterm loss By Mike Riggs - The Daily Caller 10:31 AM 11/02/2010
The great recasting has begun. What does a Republican victory a whole slew of them, actually, in states both red and blue mean for the Democratic Party? In the collective brain pan of the Democratic National Committee , not much.
Democrats knew that 2010 would be an uphill battle for three reasons, reads a memo that the DNC sent its allies early this morning. Anticipating a drubbing, the committees talking points suggest that theres nothing out of the ordinary about todays likely Republican victory:
The party of the president historically loses seats in midterm elections; Too many people are looking for work or struggling to get by as a result of eight years of irresponsible economic policies (and despite creating more private sector jobs in the last eight months than President Bush did in 8 years); the sheer number of seats were defending this year as a result of the successes of 2006 and 2008, including 49 Democratic representatives on the ballot this year whose districts John McCain won in 2008.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
Another way to look at it is that DNC credits Bush with Republican Victory. That Bush sure has some long coattails.
LOL I have to admit that is Funny !!!! Only you,
[Mrs]T
"Too many?"
Ha Ha freakin' HA!
Not so many as the retard DNC would have us believe. As I posted on another thread this morning...
"This addresses the morons on talk shows supporting the First Maggot claiming that the U.S. economy went south in 2007, during Bush's Presidency.
"Morons, by definition, are incapable of grasping the concept of cause and effect.
"The handwriting was on the wall in 2007. Business and Citizens with a brain saw, in 2007, that there was a chance, however improbable, that a radical socialist progressive could ---even remotely --- be elected president due to factors which have been discussed at length since then.
"The economy responded rationally until the results were in.
"The results were the biggest disaster for the US outside of Pearl Harbor, WW2 and 911."
If I were a "normal" Black, that is, non-welfare, non-sports, non-entertainment, non-criminal, non-hyphenated identity, I would want to hide for the rest of my life in shame.
Unfortunately, the "First Black President" wildly exceeded the negative expectations of the most wild-eyed, spit-spraying racist in America --- all by himself; well, with a LOT of help from the first Saquatch, and the 60s criminal "Progressives."
And that "First Black President" thing can never happen again. Ever.
They’re engaging in revisionism before the the election starts. That’s rich.
It wasn't because Bush was distracted by the war. It was because he consciously desired some kind of united North America.Interesting take on it. I didn't think he was distracted by the war as much as I thought he had (in his estimation and in the estimation of his advisors, such as Rove) expended all his political capital on the war and didn't have any left to spare for things like shutting down the border and fighting the rats to save the banking system.
But on the border issue, maybe you're right. Maybe he was doing exactly what he wanted on that. Which makes him a fool.
There is no such thing as national security without border security and Iraq was a war of national security.
Of course it’s Bush’s fault. When he tossed that opening pitch the other night, the voters realized how much they miss him.
(AGAIN)
That is just wrong on SO many levels
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.