Posted on 10/29/2010 1:08:50 PM PDT by LibWhacker
"Dont you get it? Prop 19 is bigger government. They will have to create a whole department so drug users can get drugs paid for by the tax payers."
Now that you've had a chance to really read Prop 19, you know like I know that your claim was just a lot of baloney. There is no such provision.
I was trying to be generous to you by offering that maybe you heard that baloney from someone else. The alternative is that you just made up that baloney yourself.
But, no matter how you slice it, Nick, baloney is baloney and you should always read these propositions for yourself so that you don't wind up with a head full of baloney when you're voting.
And, if sometimes you're unclear as to what you should do, just ask me. I won't give you no baloney! :)
The minority issue is rather flimsy IMO. You wind up with folks like Gloria Molina, Maxine Waters, Henry Waxman... now there’s a lofty goal.
Nothing is free. They will keep the vehicle fee forever and start charging you for entrance to the parks within one year of the date this thing passes!!!!!! VOTE NO!!! It's a TAX for Heaven's sake.
Have you lost your mind?
Flimsy, yes. But it’s the law, unfortunately.
Bump
And if it fails, seeing how easy Prop 27 got on the ballot shortly after passage of Prop 11, we have the next eight years to qualify an initiative with any necessary changes, and we'll have empirical data to prove our case.
So I am willing to give this panel a chance.
I know one of the criteria was that one could not have been on a party central committee for the past ten years, which disqualified me from considering applying, so this takes some of the hard-core political party activists out of the running (not all, but some is better than none).
Good points, CCC.
We should all watch closely and pounce early if
this turns out bad.
Yikes, I do vaguely remember that. I must have Alzheimer’s or something since I totally forgot about it, or was subconsciously willing to ignore it. Still, if we can’t trust someone who is otherwise solidly conservative, who can we trust? I like all of his recommendations for those initiatives I understand. Guess I’ll just have to be careful about the ones I don’t and read DeVore’s recs, Rush, and especially, Free Republic, all the time!
Awww, it’s for all things McClintock. I thought it might be only for his proposition recs. I’d better pass, thank you. Already on too many ping lists to manage.
I’m convinced, Prop 25 is definitely going to get a big fat ‘NO’ vote from me, thanks!
Somebody usually posts his recommendations before each election w/ Keyword “McClintock”. You can usually find it about the time ballots are mailed out.
I’m not sure why I, or someone else, didn’t post this earlier. I know it was posted in the body of one thread, but it deserved its own.
Thanks for posting it.
Great information, thanks. Very interesting. I’m with you. Don’t like it, but don’t want legislators directly involved in redistricting either. It’s an age-old problem. Amazing that after centuries, gerrymandering issues are still with us. No one’s found the perfect solution.
Read Atlas Shrugged. You are one of the Looters.
I had come around to you’re way of thinking on this, and can confirm I’ll be voting for it.
I appreciate your comments on it. I agree with them.
No one is discriminated against or denied any right or privilege for alcohol use, are they?
Well, I was only addressing what I saw as reality. I’m not overly upset over it. We’ll see how it works out.
Thanks for your post.
Undoubtedly. I was unaware that the proposition had that wording and I was wondering why one of my dopehead friends was so supportive of it, now I know.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.