Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tallguy
The problem with automation is not that it is expensive but that, in most cases, it is infeasible (prohibitively expensive, if you want to split hairs).
41 posted on 10/27/2010 7:01:58 AM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: TopQuark

“The problem with automation is not that it is expensive but that, in most cases, it is infeasible (prohibitively expensive, if you want to split hairs).”

I don’t disagree with that. I would add that every product has a life-cycle. For things like electronic sub-components these lives can be measured in just a few years.

Automation really only helps cut costs during the high-production phase. Once the product slips back into low-production or MRO phases then the automation is mothballed/converted to another product. That older component often gets shipped off to a foreign subsidiary that does the work with hand tools and “Level One” automation because the product gets labor-intensive again.


67 posted on 10/27/2010 9:35:36 AM PDT by Tallguy ("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson