from what I understand, he wouldn’t mind releasing the records if he was also released from his attorney-client privilege so he could actually TALK about what happened.
I think you are correct and I think I saw something like that in another story talking about ‘client attorney privileges’.
http://www.ktuu.com/news/ktuu-2010elect-miller-fnsb-record-decision-reactions-102410,0,6252425.story
“We had some concerns on the expedited process, but on the merits of the ruling it may be that the Miller campaign decides it's fine where it is,” said Miller’s attorney, Thomas Van Flein. “The entire time, Mr. Miller was saying, ‘We need to get this information out, but we also need to make sure my rights are protected and the borough’s rights are protected.’”