To: smoothsailing
I didn't see the O'Donnell-Coons debate but Ann Coulter did - and she claims that O'Donnell cleaned Coon's clock, with aplomb. Meghan McCain's inane opinion is laughably irrelevant. She wishes she had O'Donnell's looks and brains.
2 posted on
10/21/2010 3:04:42 PM PDT by
Jim Scott
(Cautious optimist)
To: smoothsailing
"All you have to do is laugh," O'Donnell said. "She's a blogger,
and she's entitled to say whatever she wants."That is in the First Amendment
Go Christine!!!
3 posted on
10/21/2010 3:04:51 PM PDT by
TexasPatriot1
("Tyranny is defined as that which legal for the government but illegal for the citizenry" Jefferson)
To: smoothsailing
Earth to Odonnell: Facts and Truth are irrelavent to the media.
4 posted on
10/21/2010 3:11:41 PM PDT by
pennyfarmer
(Even a RINO will chew its foot off when caught in a trap.)
To: smoothsailing
Meghan McCain is the nut-job. She needs to do us all a favor and shut the heck up.
6 posted on
10/21/2010 3:20:59 PM PDT by
RepubRep
(VOTE . . . VOTE , . . VOTE!!!!!)
To: smoothsailing
9 posted on
10/21/2010 3:30:31 PM PDT by
mrsmith
To: smoothsailing
People need to actually see this debate before commenting. It was humiliating for Republicans and Conservatives everywhere. The entire audience was laughing at her, there is no way she thought she won this is just a clear attempt at spin on her part.
Christine definitely cost us the seat in Delaware, and she may end up costing us Pennsylvania too.
11 posted on
10/21/2010 3:59:41 PM PDT by
3ML
To: smoothsailing
"while Coons was unable to recite the five freedoms guaranteed by the First Amendment. "Coons was probably confused because he wasn't sure which constitution the moderator was referring to.
29 posted on
10/21/2010 4:44:17 PM PDT by
cookcounty
(Dec 31st is coming: .....Stop Bark-bark Obama's Midnight Jack-Up!)
To: smoothsailing
Us conservatives should cite the fact specifically, that the phrase "separation of church and state" does NOT appear anywhere in the Constitution, when the lefties try to shoehorn it into the First Amendment.
We should immediately follow by quoting: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof", which means that no person of faith may be prohibited from speaking or holding government office based on religion.
When they bite on that one, you can point out that people have the right to do both at the same time. "no law" means NO LAW period.
33 posted on
10/21/2010 5:09:52 PM PDT by
Navy Patriot
(Sarah and the Conservatives will rock your world.)
To: smoothsailing
"It's really funny the way that the media reports things,..." Yes, isn't it?
34 posted on
10/21/2010 5:10:41 PM PDT by
3niner
(When Obama succeeds, America fails.)
To: smoothsailing; 3ML
.......3ML Please visit our FReepatron tread and make a donation........Hi Smooth.........
41 posted on
10/21/2010 6:27:42 PM PDT by
GitmoSailor
(AZ Cold War Veteran -Will the NOV election only be LOST under MARTIAL LAW?)
To: smoothsailing
I am sure McDonnell won the debate, as did Hayworth. But the problem is the people of DE and AZ.
48 posted on
10/21/2010 8:41:20 PM PDT by
Theodore R.
(Rush was right when he said America may survive Obama but not the Obama supporters.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson