Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pelosi's Favorable Rating as Speaker Drops to 29%, a New Low
Gallup ^ | 10-20-10

Posted on 10/20/2010 8:46:29 AM PDT by Justaham

Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's favorable rating is down seven percentage points since May to 29%, a new low for her since assuming the top congressional post.

Pelosi's ratings were 2-to-1 positive, 44% to 22%, when she first assumed the speakership in January 2007, but they became closely divided by March of that year and remained so in November 2008. Views became more negative than positive for the first time in the first half of 2009, possibly because of Pelosi's public stance against the CIA's use of "enhanced interrogation" of terrorist suspects at Guantanamo Bay prison, and her dispute with the CIA over whether she had been briefed on the matter. Spanning the period these issues were in the news, her favorable rating fell from 42% to 32%. Pelosi's favorable rating recovered slightly in the first half of 2010 to 36%, but it has since tumbled to the new low.

Independents in particular have become more negative about Pelosi, with her favorability dwindling nine points among this group since May, to 21%. Nearly 6 in 10 independents (58%) now view her unfavorably, compared with 86% of Republicans and 22% of Democrats.




(Excerpt) Read more at gallup.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: democrats; elections; fail; pelosi

1 posted on 10/20/2010 8:46:30 AM PDT by Justaham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Justaham

Wow. Who are these 29% and what are they smoking?


2 posted on 10/20/2010 8:50:55 AM PDT by MichaelNewton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

Too bad that’s not the approval rate in her District of Debauchery... but it isn’t, unfortunately.


3 posted on 10/20/2010 8:51:23 AM PDT by ScottinVA (The West needs to act NOW to aggressively treat its metastasizing islaminoma!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham
Nancy,

It sure is a b*tch when people pay attention, is it not?

It will be a happy day in America when you are no longer able to additional damage to this great country.

Good riddance.

4 posted on 10/20/2010 8:53:23 AM PDT by Gabrial (The Whitehouse Nightmare will continue as long as the Nightmare is in the Whitehouse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

Still way too high


5 posted on 10/20/2010 8:53:50 AM PDT by Outlaw Woman (Live Free or Die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Outlaw Woman

Too high by half. But lower than Bush at his lowest IIRC.


6 posted on 10/20/2010 8:54:36 AM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

I suppose there really is no hope for a certain segment.


7 posted on 10/20/2010 8:57:49 AM PDT by Outlaw Woman (Live Free or Die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; Delacon; dervish; ...

a new low for her

s/b

a new low, even for her

;’)

Thanks Justaham.

The focus to get rid of this treasonous corrupt b-word must be on the Senate races — dump your local Demwit, and get rid of the Left-Coast’s contribution to the War on America, Pelousy.


8 posted on 10/20/2010 8:58:58 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichaelNewton
Who are these 29% and what are they smoking?

Whatever it is, you can be sure it's funded by the taxpayer.
9 posted on 10/20/2010 8:58:58 AM PDT by ComputerGuy (HM2/USN M/3/3 Marines RVN 66-67)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Justaham
Of all the things written and voiced about this sub-human, the only thing I'll remember is her words trying to get the health bill voted on: “You have to vote for it - then you'll find out what's in it”

That's about the most anti-American thing I've ever heard from a Speaker - ever. And the stooges who did vote for it without reading it (much less understanding it) deserve nothing less than an orange jumpsuit. This alone call for the complete overhaul of the Congress.

10 posted on 10/20/2010 9:07:38 AM PDT by MichaelCorleone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ComputerGuy

>>Who are these 29% and what are they smoking?

>>Whatever it is, you can be sure it’s funded by the taxpayer.

Now we know why they want to legalize marijuana in Pelosi’s home state. Nothing to do with civil rights. Democrats just need drugged-out voters.


11 posted on 10/20/2010 9:10:26 AM PDT by MichaelNewton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MichaelCorleone; All
"...the only thing I'll remember is her words trying to get the health bill voted on: “You have to vote for it - then you'll find out what's in it”"


12 posted on 10/20/2010 9:14:21 AM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

If the numbers are to be believed, what is it about this woman that 29% like? I just don’t get it.


13 posted on 10/20/2010 9:33:51 AM PDT by mikey_hates_everything
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Whoops, I meant the House.

Not that we shouldn’t be dumping Reid — we’ve got that covered from two sides I think.


14 posted on 10/20/2010 11:01:37 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mikey_hates_everything
29% is an awfully high number. It's depressing to think there are that many brain dead in the US.

I would venture many are female who are totally ignorant of politics, but figure that if a woman is in a position of high power, it's a good thing. Of course, those same women "can't STAND Sarah Palin", but they won't be able to tell you why.

15 posted on 10/20/2010 3:54:07 PM PDT by Mygirlsmom (Just ask Coates: The Obama Admin has no problem with racism as long as it's "applied correctly")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson