Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
I was being a bit facetious with my somewhat tongue in cheek response. Let's cut to the chase:

Which are you contending:

a) No Blacks served in the CSA
b) Some may have served, but in lesser roles or by force.
c) Yes, a few misguided blacks did serve, but nowhere close to the number reported.

68 posted on 10/20/2010 9:41:29 AM PDT by Michael.SF. (Current count of friends/family who have abandoned Obama: 11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: Michael.SF.
I was being a bit facetious with my somewhat tongue in cheek response. Let's cut to the chase:

Which are you contending:

a) No Blacks served in the CSA b) Some may have served, but in lesser roles or by force. c) Yes, a few misguided blacks did serve, but nowhere close to the number reported.

He doesn't answer direct questions. It's the Yankee statist way.

76 posted on 10/20/2010 9:50:29 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

To: Michael.SF.

I’d say ‘c’ is the closest to my position, though ‘misguided’ is your choice of words and not mine. I’m sure that some were there willingly while many were not. Some had a choice, but most probably did not. What is undeniable is that none served legally as combat soldiers until March of 1865.


79 posted on 10/20/2010 9:54:53 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Hey mo-joe! Here's another one for your collection.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson