In my opinion, pot should be regulated similar to liquor. However there are thousands of federal laws that supersede state laws. If you can find a federal judge that says federal pot laws are unconstitutional, and it’s upheld, then OK. If Congress changes the law, then OK. Constitutional amendment, OK. But until then this medical marijuana movement is stupid. So is legalization at the state level. You guys are saying that since the feds are not enforcing immigration like they should, they should look the other way on reefer. That’s dumb
What is the constitutional basis for your opinion?
However there are thousands of federal laws that supersede state laws.
Yes, we are all aware of that. It is one of the reasons for Free Republic:
"A return to a strictly Constitutional form of federal government will automatically repeal and abolish all unconstitutional federal involvement in states issues such as: crime, health, education, welfare and the environment. The Tenth Amendment will again be in effect, which will bar all federal attempts at legislating social issues."
--http://www.freerepublic.com/about.htm
__________________________________________
But until then this medical marijuana movement is stupid. So is legalization at the state level.
Do you say the same about state efforts to assert their 10th Amendment powers in other areas such as resistance to federal gun laws and Obamacare?
You guys are saying that since the feds are not enforcing immigration like they should, they should look the other way on reefer.
I made no such argument. Immigration is an enumerated federal power. State laws that contradict federal immigration laws are repugnant to the Constitution, IMO.