Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: montag813
“Did I say it was? I said 1st Amendment applies (and 4th) if it was a personal phone.”

No, sir. US law says all photos taken on or of US military facilities and personel are US property.

On the other hand, the NCO was seriously wrong to order the videos destroyed. Since this was an Army post, the CID should have been notified of their existance. They would have copied them, at least, but more probably confiscated the phone, and taken a statement, to establish chain of evidence.

I was a photographer for the USAF for a decade. Last I checked, the rules on this haven't changed from when I was active duty. There are just more ways of getting personal photos and videos.

79 posted on 10/15/2010 12:23:33 PM PDT by Old Student
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: Old Student

What’s the law if you take a photo of a US base or personnel from a public place, not on the base?


88 posted on 10/15/2010 1:00:25 PM PDT by cowtowney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson