Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How 2 civilian sleuths brought foreclosure problems to light
McClatchy Newspapers ^ | 10/13/2010 | By Tony Pugh | McClatchy Newspapers

Posted on 10/13/2010 8:44:15 PM PDT by Chunga85

More than a year before lenders, law firms and document companies began owning up to widespread paperwork problems with their foreclosure filings, Lisa Epstein and Michael Redman already knew that something was wrong — very wrong.

Redman, a former online automobile consultant, got his first taste of the problem in early 2008, when he tried to help a relative who was facing foreclosure.

As he tried to determine which of three or four supposed lenders held the note, Redman, 35, realized that not only did he not know the answer, neither did any of the companies that were asking for payment.

Epstein, a nurse who cares for cancer patients, also is going through foreclosure. She got her baptism in the world of shoddy foreclosure paperwork in the summer of 2009, however, when she tried to help a brain tumor patient keep her home.

Epstein helped draft a letter challenging the foreclosure because, as in Redman's case, it was unclear from court papers who owned the home's mortgage.

After arriving at the summary judgment hearing in her nurse's uniform, an emotional Epstein, 45, watched as the ill woman read their letter aloud in court. When the opposing attorneys never showed, the judge refused to finalize the foreclosure. The woman remains in her home as the legal wrangling continues.

"It was like something struck inside me, like this is what I'm compelled to do. I can be a nurse for people caught in this foreclosure crisis," Epstein said. "I remember thinking, 'I'm not an attorney, and there are definite obstacles, but maybe there's a role for me.' And I ran back to the hospital like I had wings. I felt like this is my purpose."

(Excerpt) Read more at mcclatchydc.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: foreclosuregate; mers; merscorp; typicalbankethics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last
Civilian Sleuths

Greedy deadbeat volunteers!

Lisa's Foreclosure Hamlet

Michael's 4closureFraud

1 posted on 10/13/2010 8:44:19 PM PDT by Chunga85
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Chunga85

This is going to become a huge mess.


2 posted on 10/13/2010 8:53:56 PM PDT by isthisnickcool (Sharia? No thanks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool; NVDave; stephenjohnbanker; M. Espinola; blam; Quix; 2ndDivisionVet; Lorianne; ...

If we remain diligent (like these two) we’ll find an equitable and legal solution. If you’ve been hosed down by your alleged “lender” these two sites are the place to go.


3 posted on 10/13/2010 9:07:27 PM PDT by Chunga85 ("Foreclosure Fraud", TARP, "Mortgage Crisis", Bailout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool

Wait till all those folks who have been kicked out of their homes get lawyers, or, more likely, lawyers go get the evictees. This is going to play hell with the whole concept of private property in land. If it happens that half of all the real estate in the country or more is unable to ever again get unclouded titles the government will assume at some point the responsibility and maybe the titles.


4 posted on 10/13/2010 9:11:13 PM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's "Economics In One Lesson.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AngieGal

ping


5 posted on 10/13/2010 9:12:46 PM PDT by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Chunga85

bookmark


6 posted on 10/13/2010 9:15:49 PM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus

Anyone who wants on/off the foreclosuregate ping list let me know.


7 posted on 10/13/2010 9:16:08 PM PDT by Chunga85 ("Foreclosure Fraud", TARP, "Mortgage Crisis", Bailout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Chunga85

A group of our neighbors helped a disabled woman that was getting foreclosed on. She had nowhere to go. It took incredible amount of digging to find the bank.

Definately something wrong. Those that say it is only deadbeats are ignorant of the situation. If you have not dealt with it first hand, you don’t know.


8 posted on 10/13/2010 9:21:10 PM PDT by gunsequalfreedom (Conservative is not a label of convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

The potential mess is giant. You got that right. What do you think the risks are for anyone that picked up a foreclosed home?


9 posted on 10/13/2010 9:22:29 PM PDT by gunsequalfreedom (Conservative is not a label of convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Chunga85

I do not believe the paperwork was never done. I figure it got bundled up and shipped off to the highest bidder and will show up eventually.


10 posted on 10/13/2010 9:27:27 PM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool

Not quite. There are a number of problems on both ends.
When I exiled myself from NY, my closing of the co-op sale was delayed by 2 weeks since Morgan Stanley, the loan originator and servicer, had trouble finding the actual deed.

In a legal system, it is entirely fair and reasonable to expect that proof, i.e. signed paperwork, be presented as evidence. I have worked on systems, many years ago, that were automated ticklers that would provide notice that a new UCC 7(?), or lien (which is what the bank holds on your property if you have a mtg), had to be renewed. This stuff used to be taken seriously. Then again, another place I worked at bid on mortgages that were faxed in, i.e. we had an address, an amount, a coupon, and a term; a scratch and dent loan. Made a ton of money of that garbage, and thankfully now out of business.

I declare a pox on both sides, but it looks really bad that major companies were sloppy in their handling of paperwork.


11 posted on 10/13/2010 9:37:37 PM PDT by flushing_kenny (One by one, I will stop the motors of the world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: arthurus
This is going to play hell with the whole concept of private property in land.

And guess which political party this will benefit?

12 posted on 10/13/2010 9:38:26 PM PDT by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
"I do not believe the paperwork was never done. I figure it got bundled up and shipped off to the highest bidder and will show up eventually."

Or purposefully destroyed to cover up for nonconforming, or poor underwriting standards that wouldn't have allowed the mortgage to be bundled into a security, allowing the investor(s) to put the mortgage back onto the lender. I believe this entire thing goes deeper than many folks realize. So many of these mortgages couldn't have met standards to get bundled for investors. In their covering their tracks, the banks broke the chain of paperwork to prove who owns it.

13 posted on 10/13/2010 9:40:45 PM PDT by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Chunga85
Related thread:

Legal Heat On Robo-Signing Stokes Foreclosure Fiasco - Attorneys General of all 50 states......

14 posted on 10/13/2010 9:41:52 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ikka

Well well well guess this isn’t just about ‘dead beats’ looks like we are all in the same boat, but will the rule of law win out? Stay tuned!


15 posted on 10/13/2010 9:44:10 PM PDT by Kartographer (".. we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer
PressTV 1 News Analysis (with Max Keiser)

US Dollar under attack due to Foreclosuregate?

16 posted on 10/13/2010 9:50:39 PM PDT by Chunga85 ("Foreclosure Fraud", TARP, "Mortgage Crisis", Bailout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Chunga85
. . they'd signed thousands of affidavits without reading them

Just following Congress' habits passing major legislation !

People should go to jail over this, but will they ?

17 posted on 10/13/2010 9:50:43 PM PDT by 1066AD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1066AD
"People should go to jail over this, but will they?"

Only if WE let them.

18 posted on 10/13/2010 9:52:55 PM PDT by Chunga85 ("Foreclosure Fraud", TARP, "Mortgage Crisis", Bailout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

Confiscation of private property is a tenet of the Marxism.


19 posted on 10/13/2010 10:08:55 PM PDT by ez ("Abashed the devil stood and felt how awful goodness is." - Milton, Paradise Lost)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: KoRn
Or purposefully destroyed to cover up for nonconforming, or poor underwriting standards that wouldn't have allowed the mortgage to be bundled into a security, allowing the investor(s) to put the mortgage back onto the lender. I believe this entire thing goes deeper than many folks realize. So many of these mortgages couldn't have met standards to get bundled for investors. In their covering their tracks, the banks broke the chain of paperwork to prove who owns it.

How can a lender foreclose if they have no documentation they in fact have a legitimate claim for said mortgage? I think the first initial sale of some of these mortgages contained said documents and got bundled, and then as mortgage companies began to fold they were bought wholesale with only a portion of the paperwork and the new lender 'assumed' they now owned the mortgages... as this one story demonstrates it was not the lender that disclosed lack of documentation but buyers in foreclosure asking the right questions.

IF the lender cannot demonstrate they own the mortgage how can they legally foreclose? There can be no clean title change to resell and who in their right mind will buy a mortgage for property that apparently legally does not exist.

And how can a county assess taxation upon property they cannot prove exists other than its literal presence?

I have no doubt this scam goes beyond our wildest imaginations and once it took flight it became a dog pile, almost by design to never discover the originators of this scam.

20 posted on 10/13/2010 10:10:10 PM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson