Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jamese777

BS, you Obots can’t determine from that exchange between the illegal alien lawyer and Scalia that he has excluded jus sanguinis.

Before Scalia had a chance to expand on his words and thoughts of who is a natural born citizen, the batty Ruth “Baader-Meinhof” gang Ginsberg cut off the conversation when it got dangerously close to what constitutes a natural born citizen that she did not want to hear.


762 posted on 10/16/2010 9:27:39 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 760 | View Replies ]


To: Red Steel

BS, you Obots can’t determine from that exchange between the illegal alien lawyer and Scalia that he has excluded jus sanguinis.

Before Scalia had a chance to expand on his words and thoughts of who is a natural born citizen, the batty Ruth “Baader-Meinhof” gang Ginsberg cut off the conversation when it got dangerously close to what constitutes a natural born citizen that she did not want to hear.


What part of “IT REQUIRES JUS SOLI” didn’t you understand?

Justice Scalia is anything but a shrinking violet in oral arguments. If he had wanted to add a statement in support of Jus Sanguinis, he would have done it and he would have interrupted his closest personal friend on the High Court and his weekly lunch companion, Ruth Bader Ginsberg to do it.


768 posted on 10/16/2010 9:54:18 PM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 762 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson