Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Las Vegas Ron

See post 542 for what the Supreme Court thinks.


543 posted on 10/15/2010 2:09:50 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (When the ass brays, don't reply...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 539 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Rogers
Only problem with your cite is that your boy was never a Natural Born Citizen....it's just another attempt at your well recognized obfuscation and deliberate distortions (lies)
571 posted on 10/15/2010 3:29:48 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (Moderates manipulate, extremists use violence, but the goal is the same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 543 | View Replies ]

To: Mr Rogers
Notice this little gem in your own post and link???

14 Stat. 27; Fourteenth Amendment, § 1; United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U. S. 649. In a comprehensive review of the principles and authorities governing the decision in that case -- that a child born here of alien parentage becomes a citizen of the United States -- the Court adverted to the....

Hmmm, wonder why they would have left out the Natural Born part???

Not that a fact from your own sources matter to you or would get in the way of defending your boy.

574 posted on 10/15/2010 3:44:57 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (Moderates manipulate, extremists use violence, but the goal is the same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 543 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson