Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Regulator

“But the Judge in one of Keyes cases would not throw out the case on that basis...which is the same as acknowledging that he did have standing. Get the point now?”

The judge specifically REFUSED to rule he had standing. Or that he did not. The judge DID NOT MAKE A RULING on his ‘standing’.

Get the point now?


277 posted on 10/14/2010 9:18:32 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (When the ass brays, don't reply...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Rogers
Still don't get it, do ya, Rodgers?

The judge evaded the issue on purpose. Because he knew he wouldn't be able to dump Keyes for lack of standing. So he picked something else to hang his hat on. It's a tacit admission that Keyes would win.

Good little government employees that you all are, you don't want to provoke your masters. So you close ranks, and use every evasive tactic in the book. This is one of them. The judges are corrupt, just like all the other bureaucrats. Think Susie Bolton is just an idealistic champion of civil rights? Or an ambitious little skank looking for a nice promotion after the dust settles?

Mr. Obama used the courts to disqualify people that he ran against in Illinois. For much, much less serious issues. So he and his gang bangers know the game. They spent millions running interference on this problem. They still are. But they know that with the mindset of the government people - "what we say is law, screw what's on the books" - they can get over.

And they did. And guys like you are still out here, running cover for them.

Good Boy. Your check's in the mail.

476 posted on 10/15/2010 10:53:55 AM PDT by Regulator (Watch Out! Americans are on the March! America Forever, Mexico Never!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson