Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: edge919

Are you being purposely oblivious?? I just provided direct quotes that it did and WKA affirmed it. No amount of spin, misdirection and debunked talking points changes this.


Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1874), was a United States Supreme Court case appealed from the Supreme Court of Missouri concerning the Missouri law which ordained “Every male citizen of the United States shall be entitled to vote.”

Virginia Minor, a leader of the women’s suffrage movement in Missouri, alleged that the refusal of Reese Happersett, a Missouri state registrar, to allow her to register to vote was an infringement of her civil rights under the Fourteenth Amendment.
http://supreme.justia.com/us/88/162/index.html


2,707 posted on 10/27/2010 10:22:28 AM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2705 | View Replies ]


To: jamese777
According to Justice Waite, in WKA: "Minor v. Happersett (1874), 21 Wall. 162, 166-168. The decision in that case was that a woman born of citizen parents within the United States was a citizen of the United States, although not entitled to vote, the right to the elective franchise not being essential to citizenship."

Waite also quotes Minor, "At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children, born in a country of [p680] parents who were its citizens, became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners."

2,709 posted on 10/27/2010 10:32:22 AM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2707 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson