“If born in Hawaii, meets YOUR definition of NBC and YOUR interpretation of court cases, not the commonly accepted one.”
The only court to formally issue a ruling on Obama’s eligibility is the one in Indiana, which wrote:
“Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents. Just as a person “born within the British dominions [was] a natural-born British subject” at the time of the framing of the U.S. Constitution, so too were those “born in the allegiance of the United States [] natural-born citizens.”
http://www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/pdf/11120903.ebb.pdf
No other court will even bother with the merits of the birther case, refusing to consider them since the people bringing the case have no ‘standing’. And those who do - the 50 states, each with a legislature, each with a DA, each with a SecState, 535 members of Congress, etc - reject your interpretation.
In fact, the American People, by a vote of 69 to 60 million, rejected your argument. Want to explain again why “no one else seems to agree with [me]”?
ROFLMAO you do realize how foolish you look to everyone else but jamese777, don’t you?