Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Danae

“The 14th Amendment was an act of congress until it was ratified by the states, and it became an Amendment.”

No, your insults are not arguments. An act of Congress is a LAW. A proposed amendment, not ratified by the states, is NOTHING but proposed wording.

And the 14th Amendment, having been ratified, is the CONSTITUTION, not an act of Congress. And when Scalia contrasted acts of Congress as the basis for citizenship vs an act of Congress, the 14th is CONSTITUTION, not an act of Congress.


2,156 posted on 10/25/2010 8:59:23 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (When an ass brays, don't reply)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2147 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Rogers
And when Scalia contrasted acts of Congress as the basis for citizenship vs an act of Congress, the 14th is CONSTITUTION, not an act of Congress.

The quote you provided earlier from Scalia didn't say anything about 'acts' of Congress, just about citizenship being conferred by Congress. The 14th amendment would be a case of Congress conferring citizenship.

2,157 posted on 10/25/2010 9:19:20 AM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2156 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson