Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 23 Everest

Nope. The law is clear. His orders were lawful regardless of Obama’s status.


21 posted on 10/13/2010 3:38:23 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: BuckeyeTexan

Nope. The law is clear. His orders were lawful regardless of Obama’s status.

Yes they were, however he has to serve the Constitution first!


27 posted on 10/13/2010 3:42:31 PM PDT by 23 Everest (A gun in hand is better than a cop on the phone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

>Nope. The law is clear. His orders were lawful regardless of Obama’s status.

He has sworn to uphold and defend the Constitution; to leave the question of Obama’s eligibility unresolved would be dishonorable and Conduct Unbecoming an Officer.

...Or do you want to argue that a military officer has no interest or obligation to see the Constitution followed?


33 posted on 10/13/2010 3:49:04 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Too bad, isn’t it...he has to serve the constitution first, before the man sitting in the White House...think again...and yes, I suspect we’re going to see a change of attitude in lots of places shortly, including the White House which is going to have the living HELL investigated out of it.


166 posted on 10/13/2010 6:57:08 PM PDT by RowdyFFC (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson