Dr CONspiracy usually deletes your posts on his website to cover for your conniving butt Jamie, but this one is too new. Dr. CON is slipping up.
There seems to be a bit of a discussion over there as to whether Danae’s birth certificate is a forgery or not.
For example:
“Not on security paper
No “This copy serves as prima….”
No “Any alteration invalidates….”
Etc”
And:
“Not even a good attempt NOT a “Long Form”
No seal
No signature
Not (to use the favorite Birfoon phrase) contemperaneous i.e. not just issued
wow that is so fake…..”
And, The most compelling post to me is one that states that there is no hospital in Honolulu named “Kaiser Foundation Hospital” nor has there ever been.
To wit:
“And there was never a hospital in Honolulu called Kaiser Foundation Hospital; its always been known as Kaiser Medical Center or Moanalua Medical Center or the Kaiser Permanente Honolulu Clinic.”
Kaiser Foundation Hospital is the name of the group (foundation) that runs the individual hospitals in Hawaii, its not a SPECIFIC hospital.
And there is this post:
“AUWE!! You are full of kukae Danae. You might have fooled some Freepers, but Native Hawaiians like myself, who have made sincere inquiries to the DOH & DHHL for “the old” copies of mine & our family members’ birth documents, know that you are a total liar. As penance, I suggest that you make a $200 donation to Kapiolani Medical Center for Women & Children, the Birthplace of President Barack Hussein Obama.”
Aloha & Goodnight, from Honolulu Hawai’i
And: “More anomalies in Danae’s BC – the font size for number and street – 5320-7 Likini Street is different from the the next line the “Mother Mailing Address” line. Both would have been typed in, presumably with the same typewriter, although on the Janna BC the “Mother Mailing Address” is left blank.
Maybe Danae should have done the same thing. LOL”
I think I’ll check out for myself whether there has ever been a Kaiser Foundation Hospital, as I am a Kaiser Permanente member myself and I will wait until the dust clears a bit before sending my donation to FreeRepublic.
I would hate for Danae’s certificate to turn out to be just another Obama’s Mombassa, Kenya “birth certificate.”
Hey Danae, our troll girl is thinking you are a liar. Pay up you deranged troll. You lost the bet. That whole website run by Dr CONspiracy should be in a mental institution. You’re a turd.
You need to join your fellow turds at that website. Be a zot you Obama rear end. All these guys are FR zots on that thread.
Kapuna a Zot
http://www.freerepublic.com/~Kupuna/
gorefan a Zot
http://www.freerepublic.com/~gorefan/
James M a Zot
http://www.freerepublic.com/~JamesM/
Hawaiiborn a Zot
http://www.freerepublic.com/~Hawaiiborn/
John Patlin a Zot
http://www.freerepublic.com/~JohnPatlin/
Bovril a Zot
http://www.freerepublic.com/~Bovril/
Black Lion a Zot
http://www.freerepublic.com/~BlackLion/
GeorgetownJD a Zot
http://www.freerepublic.com/~GeorgetownJD/
mrnopants a Zot
http://www.freerepublic.com/~mrnopants/
An the head Rat Dr. Conspiracy is a Zot
http://www.freerepublic.com/~drconspiracy/
Pay up troll.
The head rat Dr. Con covers for your lying butt. He removes your posts. He likes to see you troll. As an example, this post of your was remove from the thread, but all at once butt wipe DR Con has put restored ALL of your posts back on line after seeing this thread.
An excerpt from his website
- - - - -
Puzo1 said...
I just posted the following comment at Dr. Conspiracy's blog.
"Dr. Conspiracy,
A poster by the name of jamese777 who you probably know posted at freerepublic the following statement: 'In fact Mario Apuzzo came very close to being sanctioned for failing to mention Berg v Obama in his legal briefs, but I’m sure anything about that is way over your head.' See http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2558926/posts?q=1&;page=128#128, Comment No. 113, posted on 7/27/10, at 2:13 p.m.
I responded to jamese777 on freerepublic with the following: 'Why do you not stop posting lies, saying that I did not 'mention Berg v. Obama in [my] legal briefs.' Why do you not read my Reply Brief and see for yourself that I fully cited and discussed Berg. How can you make such a ridiculous statement when its written in black and white in my brief? So, just stop repeating the lie.' Id. at Comment No. 125, posted on 7/28/10, at 8:43 p.m.
jamese 777 then responded with a non-responsive answer. Id. at Comment No. 127, posted on 7/28/10, at 9:29 p.m.
I then posted the following: 'I see that you have been posting here quite a bit. You try to sound as though you know what you are talking about. You are the one who is commenting on what I did and did not do. Why do you not tell me how I did not cite and argue Berg in my 'briefs.' You said it so now back it up. I’ll offer you an easy way out. Just admit that you made a mistake and we will be done with it.' Id. at Comment No. 128, posted on 7/28/10, at 10:08 p.m.
What is strange is that usually jamese777 has an answer on freerepublic to other anti-Obama comments within a short time. Well, it is now 7-29-10, 12:40 p.m. Eastern time, and he still has not answered.
Now you say on this thread: 'I think the big ethical issue before the Third Circuit Court of Appeals was not so much that the appeal was frivolous as it was the Apuzzo did not cite the Berg case in the Appeal.'
Maybe you can help jamese777 and yourself by responding to my two comments. Your statement that the 'big ethical issue' is that 'Apuzzo did not cited the Berg case in the Appeal' is much more serious than jamese777's because you now are saying that I not only acted unethically in the appeal, but that I did so in a 'big' way. I believe that you do need to address this matter immediately. I will expect a clear and direct answer. That means no evasive answers. By the way, may I remind you that the name of your thread is, 'Admitting you're wrong.'
Mario Apuzzo, Esq."
Let us see if Dr. Conspiracy practices what he preaches.
Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
This is the current answer at Dr. Conspiracy's:
"bob 29. Jul, 2010 at 12:59 pm bob(Quote) #
Hi, Mario! Welcome back!
Hundreds of words wasted over not specifying that you failed to cite Berg in your opening brief. Where you should have cited it.
Mario Apuzzo 29. Jul, 2010 at 1:12pm Mario Apuzzo(Quote) #
bob"
This is my response:
"Let’s not be dishonest. jamese777 said I did not cite Berg in my appellate “briefs” and Dr. Conspiracy said I did not cite Berg in the “Appeal.” It is rather sickening to receive comments such as yours. You really do need to get a real life somewhere. You and many on this cite are nothing but deceivers in how you have addressed the so-called my ethical issue in the Kerchner appeal. I will expect an immediate answer from Dr. Conspiracy, and not such as I got from you. In default thereof, we will have to take this matter up in a different venue.
Mario Apuzzo, Esq."
FYI, Mr. Apuzzo. On Sun Aug 01 2010 13:14:39 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) jamese777 was still claiming you are to be sanctioned by the Courts from their Order To Show Cause -although the Court has reversed themselves in their most recent ruling.
The order with a link to your scribd account has been posted and James has been called out for "lying by omission". Your win on Appeal should put an end to this issue. There are those of us who want the truth to be told, regardless where it may lead, others not so much......
Thank you for all your doing.
- - - - - - - -
"To: onyx; Jim Robinson; Fiddlstix; RedMDer; thecodont; Danae; Red Steel; All
- - - - - -
We are waiting for you so pay up.
Kaiser Foundation Hospital
http://www.ucomparehealthcare.com/hospital/hawaii/kaiser_foundation_hospital.html
Kaiser Foundation Hospital-
Medical Jobs in HawaiiHonolulu, Hawaii
Hospital Address 3288 Moanalua Rd
Honolulu, HI 96819
Kaiser Foundation Hospital is a non-profit acute care hospital based at 3288 Moanalua Road in Honolulu, HI. The facility is accredited and provides emergency services.
http://citehealth.com/hospitals/hawaii/cities/honolulu/kaiser-foundation-hospital
Welcher. While you are checking things out, check out the Hawaiian Statutes that states documents are available. Email HDOH and ask them, that's real simple even a caveman can do it.
Hawaii tried to hide the availablity of the long form, but they didn't change the state law. Ask yourself why they tried to hide it? What else are they hiding? Buy a clue Sherlock.
I guess they didn't teach you much at your matchbook cover school of law and shoe repair.
It won't. I believe Danae to be 100% on the level. Her long form is genuine and any objective research will confirm that as so.