Someone finally is starting to get it from the physical chemistry and thermodynamic perspective.
But they are being careful with their language so they won’t impact the flow of the research grants....
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2604521/posts
‘Global warming is the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my life’
There's another valid way to approach the problem?
I've tried to explain the complicated nature of atmospheric chemistry and thermodynamics to people. Unfortunately they are more comfortable with the lie they can understand than the truth that they can't.